MTV Thinks Indie Bands Are Over

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


mojo-cover-blocparty.jpg A weirdly vitriolic and kind of hard-to-read article appeared today on MTVNews.com with the basic point that “indie bands are unsuccessful.” I suppose it shouldn’t be surprising — it’s kind of like George W. Bush saying global warming doesn’t exist. What are you expecting him to say? But it’s still disappointing. The writer, James Montgomery, describes some sort of mythical time — apparently, 2005 — when bands like Arcade Fire, Bloc Party, and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah were “flavors of the month.” Sadly, none of them could keep it up, because, uh, something happened, “and suddenly,” it reads, “none of them seemed to matter much any more.” Wow!

This is my least favorite kind of pseudo-journalism: “I’m going to make a name for myself as a writer by being against everything the cool kids are for.” It’s controversial and attention-grabbing! But unfortunately, the only actual statistic that Montgomery cites completely contradicts his thesis: Arcade Fire’s new album Neon Bible (as I blabbed about endlessly) debuted on the Billboard charts at #2. Seems pretty good to me. The rest of his “facts” are as follows:

–Clap Your Hands’ new album has sold 1/3 what their first one did (even though it’s only been out three months);
–Bloc Party’s latest has “all but disappeared from the cultural zeitgeist” (he even had to “wiki” the title);
–a “hunch” that Arctic Monkeys’ new CD, released this week, won’t have the same “impact” as the first one.

Right. His entire theory is baseless: independent music’s impact and popularity actually continues to expand, with recent, surprising Top 5 debuts from Bright Eyes, The Shins, and Modest Mouse. Even Bloc Party’s A Weekend in the City debuted at #12, and has sold 50,000 copies already. Not bad for a delicate, wistful album about coming to terms with your sexuality. In fact, one could make the point that with the ascendancy of iTunes, independent music has more of a potential audience than ever.

What’s the point of this article? To point out that not every single self-released, import, or independent album outsells the Pussycat Dolls? Or to find some sort of justification for MTV ignoring independent artists, by pretending they have no impact, or that they’re “over”? Well, a bit of Google sleuthing turns up an interview with Mr. Montgomery on AbsolutePunk.com, where he describes his job as covering “emo/Warped Tour/MySpace/whatever you call it punk.” Oh, okay. Well, perhaps covering Panic! At the Disco might be more up his alley.

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate