Appeals Court Set to Hear “Wardrobe Malfunction” Case

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Wardrobe Malfunction
Hey, did anyone hear about this thing? I don’t remember it getting much coverage. Back in 2004, I guess one of Michael Jackson’s sisters and a Mouseketeer were at the World Series and did a whole song and dance routine where their clothes exploded? It sounds awesome. Honestly, why doesn’t the media report on this stuff? It’s all “blah blah, indepth reporting on the war and our government’s lies.” Yawn. Well, apparently this “wardrobe malfunction” is still working its way through our nation’s court system: today, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia will hear the case of the exposed bazonga.

The FCC originally fined CBS $550,000 for the incident, which, if upheld, would be the largest fine ever against a television broadcaster. CBS appealed, saying that they “did not plan the sole part of the performance the FCC says made it indecent, the ‘costume reveal’.” Right. It seemed like an, er, open-and-shut case, but these days, the FCC’s indecency standards are coming under increasing attack, reports Reuters: two courts in New York have rejected the government’s policies on indecent speech, specifically, “fleeting expletives.” Now there’s a good name for a band.

While the issues work through the courts, the FCC has sat on its hands, or maybe everybody’s just watching their mouths: there have been no proposals of fines since March of 2006. You’re telling me we could have been ripping each other’s clothes off on TV for the last 18 months? Fleeting expletive!

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate