Doug Brooks, president of the International Peace Operations Association

Doug Brooks talks contractors

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Mother Jones: As U.S. troops begin to pull out, what happens to the contractors working in Iraq? Do they step up their role?

Doug Brooks: Obviously the money’s going to go down. If that money disappears, is the Iraqi government going to take over the contracts? I don’t know. The whole industry is demand-driven, so go back to World War II—700,000 contractors, right? They disappear at the end of World War II, go do other things or whatever, next conflict, it’s all on a spike; every time there’s a conflict, you bring in more contractors to do whatever needs to be done. Eighty thousand contractors in Vietnam, and again at the end of Vietnam, they’re gone again, and the numbers go down. So it’s constantly been up and down, and Iraq isn’t any different. We have a lot—maybe 100,000 or whatever, but it’ll go back down to where it was before. We think it will be higher than it was at the beginning because the value of contractors has been fully demonstrated. This is—no one has ever written this, but this is true—this is the best-supported and -supplied military operation in history. That’s important. And I think you’ll see NATO starting to copy this, the U.N. starting to copy this—the African Union uses private contractors all the time—so there’s still going to be a bigger role for private contractors than there has been in the past.

Take a look at Bosnia. We had more contractors in Bosnia than we did troops. There’s a huge value to using private contractors. The military doesn’t have to have all Americans doing only this sort of stuff. Why’d you need to have military guys building bridges in Afghanistan when Afghans can do it? I think this is of huge value that we’re recognizing that we don’t need to use their capability or money to do what we need to do. It’s cheaper, it’s certainly a lot faster, it supports the local economy, it creates capacities; it just makes a lot of sense.

Especially if there’s going to be a fast drawdown, you’re going to see a spike. A lot of equipment will just have to be removed and personnel and so on, so that’s going to require a huge spike in contractor activity.

MJ: Will there be new contracts required?

DB: Absolutely, or an expansion of existing contracts. What they’ve done is they’ve consolidated a lot of those smaller contracts into bigger contracts, so a lot of those smaller companies have disappeared and you have a lot of these larger companies, more resilient, more professional obviously, because they are better at following the contract and compliance issues.

MJ: Are contractors able to continue operating in Iraq even with a significantly diminished presence of U.S. troops?

DB: Absolutely. And a lot of them have made the point that they’re going to be there. And when over 90 percent of your workforce is local, it’s not a problem. They’ll continue to exist. Now they may reduce the number of non-Iraqis, or at least non-Arabs, but they can still operate.

It’s a dangerous job, and I would compare it to coal mining. Essentially, you get paid more, but you get paid more because you know how to mitigate the risk. You are going to be taking greater risks. You know how to do a particular kind of job and you have certain kinds of skill sets. It’s the same when you’re hiring security. You want someone who knows how to mitigate the risk, and when you look at our industry, and again, 95 percent of it is non-security, but if you’re going to set up a water purification station in Darfur you still have to face that risk. And you still have to face the reality that it’s going to be a lot more dangerous there than it is in Oklahoma. This is why you use a lot of ex-military people. They can tell the difference between an RPG and a mortar and how to defend against it or protect against it or whether it’s too dangerous to even do what they’re doing. I know for journalists, a lot of them go through the training that companies run in terms of what to do if you’re in a minefield, emergency medical…private companies do that training. You wouldn’t go to the military for that. Blackwater will do a better job than a 19-year-old private reading out of a manual.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate