Benjamin Button, Slumdog Lead Oscar Nods


Before we do anything here, I’d just like to post this video from Funny or Die comparing The Curious Case of Benjamin Button to another fine Oscar favorite:

Somebody should sue. Anyway, Forrest Gump 2: Old Dude Gets Young grabbed 11 whoops, 13 nominations for this year’s Oscars, beating out Slumdog Millionaire which garnered 10. Other best picture competitors include Frost/Nixon, Milk and The Reader. The acting nominations were a little surprising: Kate Winslet, who won Golden Globes for Revolutionary Road and The Reader, was nominated only for the latter, and in the best actress category rather than supporting; Clint Eastwood was snubbed in acting categories, as was Golden Globe winner Sally Hawkins. Perhaps the most heartwarming aspect of the nominations was the poor performance of The Dark Knight, skulking away into its batcave with 8 nominations, all technical except for Heath Ledger’s posthumous supporting actor nod.

After the jump: Best Animated Short Films!

I found four of the five little cartoons nominated for Best Animated Short Films, and while there’s a bit too much cutesy-cuteness going on, they’re all worth the 1-10 minutes of your time they take up. First, “Octapodi,” a French short that anthropomorphizes octopi, which I suppose is more accurate than Finding Nemo‘s creepy pan-fishy love-fest:

Next, it’s the Russian entry, “Lavatory Lovestory,” whose Russian title, “Ubornaya Istoriya,” isn’t quite as doofy. It features a bathroom attendant who finds love (the sign on the window at the end means “help wanted”).

Pixar’s entry is this cute little story of a magician’s rabbit, “Presto”:

“This Way Up” is a short but sweet tale of a bad day in the life of two undertakers:

Another French entry, “La Maison en Petits Cubes,” looks to be the most interesting, but I couldn’t find a video online: it’s a traditionally-drawn story of a man who keeps building his house higher as water rises around him. That’s, like, totally sci-fi!

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.