Men’s Health Worst Foods: Healthy List or Sneaky Ad?

Image by flickr user Matt NichollsFrom Men’s Health magazine comes a list of the worst foods in America of 2009. By “worst” Men’s Health
means worst for your body; by “food” the magazine means products or
menu items. The list is basically a catalog of the fattest prepared
foods in America.

Topping said list is Baskin Robbins’ infamous Large Chocolate Oreo
Shake, which with 2,600 calories (about 400 more calories than I consume in a day)
and 263 grams of sugar (that’s equal to about 18 cupcakes), is
essentially a heart attack in a disposable cup. Ian Froeb at the St.
Louis Riverfront Times tried the Oreo Shake last month and found the taste and color somewhat wanting:

For all those calories, the Chocolate Oreo Shake’s texture
is kinda thin. It certainly lacks the lung-draining thickness of a
classic soda-fountain shake. And all that crumbled up cookie gives it a
grainy feel. A colleague astutely compared it to a protein smoothie
loaded with whey powder.

Other gems from the Men’s Health list include the 2,000 calorie Chili’s Smokehouse Bacon Triple-The-Cheese Big Mouth Burger with Jalapeno Ranch Dressing, and the Quarter-Pounder-equivalent Romano’s Macaroni Grill Dessert Ravioli.

The list is sort of compelling in an
oh-my-God-how-can-people-eat-that-crap kind of way, but something’s a
little odd about the 20 worst foods in America. They’re part of the
magazine’s “Eat This, Not That” campaign (and $19.95 accompanying
book), so each fat bomb is shown with another, slightly less fattening,
food twin. The book is published by Rodale Press, which also owns Men’s Health.

While it does make sense to encourage people to make healthier
eating choices, the whole project is derailed by encouraging Americans
to eat other prepared foods. And, melodrama aside, it’s not the Baskin
Robbins Large Chocolate Oreo Shake that’s responsible for American
obesity. As this recent article in the New York Times about The Biggest Loser shows, the problem is that Americans rely too much on prepared foods.

Even if home cooking is of the
fried-chicken-and-mashed-potatoes variety, it rarely produces extreme
obesity, said Barry Popkin, a nutritional epidemiologist at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “Almost any kind of
cooking you can produce in a kitchen is healthier than fast food.” The
decline of home cooking worldwide, he said, is an underlying cause of

“People are eating more, and more often,” Dr. Popkin said.
“And the foods that they are consuming almost always replace meals
cooked in a kitchen and eaten at a table.” It is difficult to quantify
a decline in cooking skills, but many studies show that time in the
kitchen has declined steeply since 1965, when American women spent a
weekly average of 13 hours cooking.

The Men’s Health article is amusing to read, but it fails to address the underlying problem. If you’re really trying to eat healthier, the Prime Minister’s Prime Rib is not going to save you.

—Daniel Luzer

Image by flickr user Matt Nicholls


Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.