Lights Out…Forever?

Image: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nasa_EV_Lacertae_250408.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a>

Earth Hour starts at 8:30 PM tomorrow. Yet as people around the world prepare to throw the switch to enlighten others about climate change, I’m mildly freaked about the prospect of the lights going out for good. New Scientist reports that NASA and the National Academies of Science are pretty concerned about giant solar plasma balls wiping out the world’s power grids in an instant. And not just for an hour or two; we’re talking months or years—or at least until someone figures out a way to make more electrical transformers without using electricity. (Read the full report here.) Such a “space weather Katrina,” as the NAS helpfully describes it, could literally be the beginning of a new dark age. Oh, and of course, the next round of solar flare-ups is scheduled to start in—when else?— 2012.Is the risk of a severe geomagnetic storm just more apocalyptic hype? New Scientist‘s doomsday scenario certainly is sensational, and some of its commenters accuse NASA of trying to scare us into increasing its funding. But the NAS report puts it calmly, “While a severe storm is a low-frequency-of-occurrence event, it has the potential for long-duration catastrophic impacts to the power grid and its users.” The map on the right shows regional susceptibility to storm-induced blackouts; the higher the percentage, the higher the risk that they’d “experience long-duration outages that could extend multiple years.” Considering that, more research into space weather seems like a relatively cheap fix, especially if it could increase the warning time for a plasma event. Right now, we’d be lucky to get about 15 minutes advance warning; barely enough time for utilities to protect their facilities by shutting them down. Add some more time to that window and perhaps ensure that the Smart Grid has a built-in kill switch, and maybe we can go back to worrying about pole reversal.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.