Obama Restores Scientific Review to Endangered Species Act


President Obama issued a memorandum Tuesday requesting the heads of all federal agencies consult with scientists and other experts to determine if their actions could harm threatened and endangered species.

Consulting with experts at either the Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was required by law under the Endangered Species Act until December, when the Bush Administration issued a midnight ruling allowing agencies to skip scientific review.

Obama’s memo doesn’t officially rescind Bush’s order; it asks the heads of the Commerce and Interior Departments to review the December ruling. Until that review is completed, Obama wants agency officials to return to the status quo ante-Bush in regard to the Endangered Species Act.

The best response to the memo came from Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), who in a statement said, “Today proves that, under an Obama administration, scientists are no longer an endangered species. Thankfully, ESA in the Obama Administration now means we are ‘Ending the Scientific Aversion’ that characterized the Bush Administration’s tenure.”

I’m happy about the ruling, too, but I have to wonder: Why do Ken Salazar and the yet-to-be-confirmed Gary Locke need the time to review Bush’s rule? Why didn’t Obama just issue an executive order rescinding it? Last month’s omnibus spending bill required Obama to reissue or overturn the rule within 60 days, but this one’s a no-brainer; it doesn’t require review.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.