Solitary Confinement: A Brief History

From Quaker logic to America’s first electric chair, a quick tour of prisons past.

Photo by Adam Shemper

Prisons were a relatively new concept in the early 1800s. Punishment for crimes had been a matter for communities until then. Some took the Hammurabian approach of an eye for an eye, and public hangings in town squares were the price for murder, rape, or even horse thievery. As a more nuanced judicial system evolved, civic leaders sought a more civilized method of punishment, and even began entertaining the idea of rehabilitation.

In 1790, Walnut Street Jail in Philadelphia (built in 1773, but expanded later under a state act) was built by the Quakers and was the first institution in the United States designed to punish and rehabilitate criminals. It is considered the birthplace of the modern prison system. Newgate Prison in New York City followed shortly after, in 1797, and was joined 19 years later by the larger Auburn Prison, built in western New York state. All three were perhaps naive experiments in the very new concept of modern penology. They all began as, essentially, warehouses of torture. The gallows and stocks were moved inside, but little else changed. Those who survived generally came out as better-trained thieves and killers.

Between Philadelphia and New York, a schism in philosophies emerged: The Philadelphia system used isolation and total silence as a means to control, punish, and rehabilitate inmates; the Auburn or “congregate” system—although still requiring total silence—permitted inmates to mingle, but only while working at hard labor. At Walnut Street, each cell block had 16 one-man cells. In the wing known as the “Penitentiary House,” inmates spent all day every day in their cells. Felons would serve their entire sentences in isolation, not just as punishment, but as an opportunity to seek forgiveness from God. It was a revolutionary idea—no penal method had ever before considered that criminals might be reformed. In 1829, Quakers and Anglicans expanded on the idea born at Walnut Street, constructing a prison called Eastern State Penitentiary, which was made up entirely of solitary cells along corridors that radiated out from a central guard area. At Eastern State, every day of every sentence was carried out primarily in solitude, though the law required the warden to visit each prisoner daily and prisoners were able to see reverends and guards. The theory had it that the solitude would bring penitence; thus the prison—now abandoned—gave our language the term “penitentiary.”

Ironically, solitary confinement had been conceived by the Quakers
and Anglicans as humane reform of a penal system with overcrowded
jails, squalid conditions, brutal labor chain gangs, stockades, public
humiliation, and systemic hopelessness. Instead, it drove many men mad.

The Auburn system, conversely, gave birth to America’s first
maximum-security prison, known as Sing Sing. Built on the Hudson River
30 miles north of New York City, it spawned the phrase “sent up the
river,” meaning doomed. Although far different from Walnut Street,
Eastern State, and Auburn, in that inmates were permitted to speak to
one another, in many ways it was the most brutal prison ever built.
Various means of torture—being strung upside down with arms and legs
trussed, or fitted with a bowl at the neck and having it gradually
filled with dripping water from a tank above until the mouth and nose
were submerged—replaced isolation and silence. Sing Sing also held the
distinction of being home to America’s first electric chair.

Europe’s eyes were on the curious competing theories at Sing Sing
and Eastern State. A celebrity at the time, Charles Dickens visited
Eastern State to have a look for himself at this radical new social
invention. Rather than impressed, he was shocked at the state of the
sensory-deprived, ashen inmates with wild eyes he observed. He wrote
that they were “dead to everything but torturing anxieties and horrible
despair…The first man…answered…with a strange kind of
pause…fell into a strange stare as if he had forgotten something…”
Of another prisoner, Dickens wrote, “Why does he stare at his hands and
pick the flesh open…and raise his eyes for an instant…to those bare

“The system here, is rigid, strict and hopeless solitary
confinement,” Dickens concluded. “I believe it…to be cruel and
wrong…I hold this slow and daily tampering with the mysteries of the
brain, to be immeasurably worse than any torture of the body.”

In the late 1800s, the Supreme Court of the United States began
looking at growing clinical evidence emanating from Europe that showed
that the psychological effects of solitary were in fact dire. In
Germany, which had emulated the isolationist Pennsylvania model,
doctors had documented a spike in psychosis among inmates. In 1890, the
High Court condemned the use of long-term solitary confinement, noting
“a considerable number of prisoners…fell into a semi-fatuous
condition…and others became violently insane.”

Prisons built after this period—including Angola—were designed more
as secure dormitories for captive laborers, as envisioned in the Auburn
system. Inmates were required to work together at prison industries,
which not only kept them occupied; it helped the institutions support
themselves. Sing Sing, for example was built on a mine and constructed
entirely of the rock beneath it by inmate labor.

Eastern State was a grand failure, and it was closed in 1971, 100
years after the concept of total isolation was abandoned. But what it
revealed about the torturous effects of solitary may have made the
practice attractive to those less concerned with rehabilitation and
more interested in retribution. Solitary in the 20th century became a
purely punitive tool used to break the spirits of inmates considered
disruptive, violent, or disobedient. But even the most retributive
wardens have rarely used it for more than brief periods. After all, a
broken spirit theoretically eliminates danger; a broken mind creates

But in the past 25 years, the penal pendulum has swung back toward
the practices—absent the theories—that governed the “Philadelphia
system” invented at Eastern State. We no longer seem to have faith in
the “penitent” part of “penitentiary,” and our “corrections” system no
longer “corrects” anti-social behavior but inevitably breeds it. It can
be argued that today, almost all maximum-security prisoners in America
are kept in a kind of solitary for a large portion of their sentences.
The advent of “supermax” and “control unit” prisons in the early 1970s
has led to the construction of pod-based prisons and “security housing
units” in which all inmates are isolated one to a cell for most of
every day. They are generally allowed out for an hour each day for
exercise or a shower, and are permitted limited personal possessions
and visits. Many of the newer prisons enforce the “solitary” aspect by
keeping some prisoners in soundproof cells, so they cannot even talk or
shout at one another. The lack of regular human contact is still
considered inhumane by many rights advocates who have taken to the
state legislatures and courts to challenge its constitutionality.
Ironically, one of the loudest advocate groups is the National
Coalition to Stop Control Unit Prisons—a project of the American
Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.