Photo used under a Creative Commons license by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30546975@N00/">Watching Washington.</a>
The fact that Washington Post op-ed star George Will has been accused of inaccurate reporting isn’t so surprising. What is surprising is that the accuser is The Washington Post.
In a story published yesterday, WaPo writers Juliet Eilperin and Mary Beth Sheridan cite evidence they say “contradicts data cited in widely circulated reports by Washington Post columnist George F. Will that sea ice in the Arctic has not significantly declined since 1979.”
Grist writer David Roberts notes, “I can’t think of another instance when a news story at a newspaper explicitly called out an op-ed writer in the same paper for lying, by name.” The closest I can think of is when New York Times ombudsman Clark Hoyt publicly reproached Maureen Dowd for gender bias. But that was an opinion, not a rebuke of reporting.
The paper’s decision to call out Will was no doubt difficult, but props to them for doing the right thing—even if it leads to some awkwardness around WaPo.
