Globe Staffer Not Amused By Size of Tom Friedman’s Expense Account


Sandwiched in the New Yorker‘s profile of Carlos Helu Slim, the Mexican billionaire who’s bailing out the New York Times, is this dreadful item:

Thomas Friedman, the Times’ chief foreign affairs columnist, lauded the efforts that Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., has made to keep the newsroom intact, saying, “I just have a great deal of admiration for him.” He told me that since taking his current post, in 1995, he has never been asked by Sulzberger what he was planning to write, or how high his travel expenses would be. “To be able to say what I want to say and go where I want to go—other than a Sulzberger-owned newspaper, you tell me where that exists today.” (Of course, star reporters like Friedman live in a special universe, even at the Times.)

Friedman’s boasting about his ability to spend the Times money comes at a particularly awkward time: he’s just been criticized by the paper’s public editor for accepting a $75,000 speaking fee (he returned it) and the Times Company is not exactly in the best financial shape right now. I assume the journalists at the Times-owned Boston Globe, in danger of losing their jobs because of the company’s precarious financial situation, were not particularly impressed by the size of Friedman’s expense account. One writes, in an email obtained by the Boston Phoenix:

Colleagues: The New York Times Co. wants you to slit your own throats and take money out of your pockets so Tom Friedman (and others in New York) can travel in style and at great expense—and then brag about it.

The Times (not the Globe) lost $74.5 million last quarter and will lose a bundle in this quarter.

Stand up and tell the Times the contract they’re trying to shove down your throats is an outrage.

Vote No on June 8.

Tom Friedman would be a real mensch if he cut back on his expenses and took a pay cut to help save reporting jobs.

 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.