“Solar Roadmap” Moves to Full House

Giffords touring solar array at ASU. (Photo by Osha Gray Davidson)

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The “Solar Roadmap” bill introduced by Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona (see our profile of Giffords and the bill) passed a House committee today and is headed for a vote in the full House.

On Monday, I traveled with Rep. Giffords as she toured solar installations at Arizona State University in Tempe. While talking about the Roadmap, HR 3585, Giffords stressed that it is a way to guide the development of solar power efficiently and effectively—but without picking winners and losers among competing technologies.

 

 

“Seventy-five percent of grants from the DOE will go through the Solar Roadmap Committee,” she said. “The panel members are there to ensure that the money is invested wisely.”

The 11-member committee will be comprised of a wide variety of experts from industry, national laboratories, academia, federal agencies and relevant state and local entities.

During the markup, I was surprised to hear several Republican members speak passionately about the need to adopt solar power. I’m not sure how that sentiment will translate into action on the full House floor, where GOP leaders have been successful at ramming the party line down members’ throats.

Still it was a fascinating debate in committee.

A low spot, followed by a high one. Low: When Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) likened the solar roadmap committee to Soviet central planning. The high spot came immediately afterwards when another Congressman rapped Rohranbacher’s knuckles for his Cold War rhetoric. The “rapper” was another Republican—Rep. Vernon Ehlers of Michigan.

It was a good day for solar—let’s hope it’s the first of many.

————-

Osha Gray Davidson is a contributing blogger at Mother Jones and publisher of The Phoenix Sun, an online news service reporting on solar energy. He tweets @thephoenixsun.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate