GM Will Pay Back Gov’t Loan…With Gov’t Money?

The good news: GM will begin paying back TARP funds next month. The bad news: They’ll be using TARP money to do it.

Photo by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/notionscapital/">Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com</a> used under a Creative Commons license


This story first appeared on the ProPublica website.

GM will begin paying back the TARP money in December, the company announced this morning. It’s a statement in need of a little context.

Basically, GM will be using a portion of its $50 billion in TARP bailout money it received to in turn repay another portion of the TARP loans.

The reason GM can do this is because when GM emerged from bankruptcy, it struck a deal with the Treasury Department to carve up its obligation to the government in four different ways.

They are, briefly: 1) $986 million remained an obligation of the old GM, the husk of the company left behind through its bankruptcy restructuring, and will never be seen again, 2) $6.71 billion remained as an interest-bearing loan, 3) $2.1 billion of the obligation was converted to preferred stock, which is a form of equity ownership that pays a fixed dividend, and 4) the rest was converted to a 60.8 percent equity stake in GM.

So, for GM to completely pay back the government, GM would have to completely repay the $6.71 billion loan with interest, purchase the government’s preferred shares (as well as keeping up dividend payments), and Treasury would have to make a pretty penny, in the range of $40 billion, selling its common shares after GM goes public again.

In a comprehensive overview (PDF) earlier this month, the GAO deemed that scenario “unlikely.” The former chief of the auto task force went farther, saying that $20 billion of the $50 billion given to GM probably won’t be coming back.

GM’s announcement today was just about No. 2, that $6.71 billion loan—it will begin repaying next month, it said. But the money to repay the loan will come from a portion of the government money it has set aside. In other words, GM has not actually drawn down every dollar of the $50 billion. It has about $13.4 billion sitting in an escrow account, and it’s tagged $8.1 billion of that to repay loans it owes both the U.S. and Canadian governments. (Incidentally, GM also got a $1.3 billion loan from Germany in support of its European unit.)

And there’s your context. Essentially, the good news is that GM thinks it won’t need to draw down more than about $40 billion of the $50 billion the U.S. gave it.

As with all other recipients of the bailout, we continually track GM’s progress towards making the taxpayer whole. Since last December, GM has paid the Treasury $178 million in interest (before bankruptcy) and dividend payments. Meanwhile, about $50.4 billion remains outstanding.

Note: Not dealt with here for simplicity’s sake is $884 million which Treasury used to purchase a portion of GM’s equity in GMAC, its financing arm. In exchange, Treasury received a 35 percent equity stake in GMAC.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate