Bechtel Gets $128 Million “Small Business” Contract


There are a bunch of things that happen pretty regularly in Washington that would probably outrage the average citizen but which both political parties don’t really care much about. One example is the constant awarding of federal “small business” contracts to megacorporations. Defenders of the practice point out that the government has a small business contracting “target,” not a requirement. (The target is 23 percent, but although it awards many of the “small business” contracts to businesses that aren’t actually small, the government misses that goal anyway.) They also argue that some contracts are just too complicated or sensitive to be carried out by small businesses. But that doesn’t make it sting any less when a Fortune 500 company like Bechtel Bettis is awarded an $128 million “small business” contract.

The contract in question seems to be for the Energy Department’s Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office, which is associated with the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, which is basically a joint DOE-Bechtel venture. (This isn’t unusual. The public and private sector are inextricably intertwined throughout much of America’s defense infrastructure. The people who work at the Bettis lab are Bechtel employees, not federal employees.)

Anyway, none of this is a good excuse for counting the deal as a “small business” contract. Sure, it could be an error, but it’s probably not: In recent months, other “small business” contracts have gone to General Dynamics, Xerox, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, British Aerospace (BAE), and Dell, according to the American Small Business League. Maybe it’s too much to ask that the federal government not rely on big corporate contractors for this kind of work. But it shouldn’t be so hard for them to be honest about it.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.