February 9, 2010

Sri Lankan President Arrests Election Opponent, Dissolves Parliment

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/indi/" target="_blank">indi.ca</a> (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s been a busy February for newly reelected Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa: Just two weeks after defeating ex-General Sarath Fonseka in the polls on January 26th, he had his arch rival physically carted from his office and placed under arrest for sedition. Then, he dissolved Parliament. It seems no amount of pleading by the UN  or India’s Manmohan Singh can get Sri Lanka to just chill out. 

Rajapaksa and Fonseka were always an odd couple: closely allied during last spring’s final campaign against the separatist Tamil Tigers (LTTE), the two men fell out after the war, each accusing the other of taking sole credit for the Tigers’ defeat. After trading accusations of war crimes through the summer and fall, the President “promoted” the General to a largely ceremonial position last winter. Fonseka quit, and shortly thereafter, declared his intent to unseat his rival. 

That’s when things got really weird. Both Fonseka and Rajapaksa are suspected by international agencies of having committed war crimes during the spring campaign; both are open Sinhalese nationalists. Yet, with little trouble, Fonseka managed to secure the backing of a coalition of minority parties, including the Tamil National Alliance, a crucial ally. In the elections, he carried the largely Tamil provinces of the North and East, but lost the national vote by 17 points. 

Then day after the elections, rumors began to fly that the General had plotted with army officers to murder the President and his family. Fonseka’s campaign headquarters were searched and several campaign workers arrested.  For the last 24 hours, the General was kept in an undisclosed location, though India’s Hindustan Times is reporting that Fonseka’s wife, Anoma, was allowed to see her husband for the first time today, bringing him a change of clothes and his inhaler. Many critics fear arresting the losing presidential candidate and dissolving Parliament sends the wrong message to a country that just ended a 26-year-long civil war. That’s putting it mildly. 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate