Wait, Kindergartners Can Drive ATVs?

ATV makers say they’re all for keeping kids off dangerous four-wheelers—but when it comes to legislation, the industry is AWOL.

Flickr/ <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carlosandressegura/2882139285/">Carlos Andres Segura</a>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Larry Foreman describes himself as “a libertarian at heart,” but not when it comes to kids. A veteran emergency-room physician—he works at the Arroyo Grande Community Hospital, near the Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area in San Luis Obispo County, California—he’s seen an endless queue of injured riders of all-terrain vehicles, including children as young as 4. After a particularly busy Sunday in 2004, Foreman decided to do some research. He was stunned to find that in a recent 22-month period, the small rural hospital had treated 210 children with ATV-related injuries.

Foreman began meeting with officials and went on radio to talk up tougher regulations—quickly drawing fire from some off-roaders, including at least two who appealed to hospital officials to fire him. “I was just kind of on this Don Quixote quest, and the windmills were beating the heck out of me,” Foreman recalled.

He persisted, however, and eventually the California Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians decided to make the issue a legislative priority. In the spring of 2008, it drafted a safety bill incorporating key elements of a model law drawn up by the ATV industry, such as expanded training and the ban on kids riding adult machines. The legislation was introduced in the California Senate by State Sen. Abel Maldonado, Foreman’s senator, but a coalition of off-road groups quickly mustered to fight it, and the legislation died later that year.

Four-wheelers look disarming, almost like overgrown toys. Yet the powerful vehicles, also known as “quads,” can reach highway speeds, and unlike cars and trucks, they offer no protection in rollovers. More than 10,000 people have been killed in ATV crashes since federal authorities began keeping track in the 1980s; more than 2,500 deaths and hundreds of thousands of injuries have involved kids under 16.

ATV manufacturers profess a strong interest in safety, especially for kids. They’ve developed a model state law with tough safety requirements, including mandatory helmet use, training for young riders, and a ban on use of high-speed, adult-model ATVs by kids under 16. Keeping kids off adult machines “is not a safety issue, it’s the safety issue,” said Thomas Yager, vice president of the Specialty Vehicle Institute of America, the Irvine-based trade group of leading ATV producers. Yet manufacturers have often stood passively by when advocates like Foreman have tried to pass safety legislation—no matter how closely it hewed to the industry’s own model law.

The industry appeared indifferent when the emergency physicians’ legislation died in 2008—just as it had in 2007, when a similar ATV safety bill failed in Oregon. Critics, citing such episodes, accuse the industry of playing a double game—talking up safety measures to score PR points, then watching while dealers and off-road enthusiasts rise up to kill the bills.

The companies firmly deny it. “I reject that we just pay lip service” to safety regulation, said Kathy Van Kleeck, senior vice president for government relations at the Specialty Vehicle Institute.

ATV makers didn’t just watch from the sidelines, records and interviews show. Several members of the Specialty Vehicle Institute—Yamaha, Kawasaki, Polaris and KTM—were also members of an advocacy group that lobbied against the bill.

• • •

In the far southeast corner of California, the Imperial Sand Dunes stretch more than 40 miles, in some places rising 300 feet above the desert floor. The windblown remains of an ancient lake, the tawny sands draw only the hardiest visitors during long months of insane heat. But from late fall through winter, the dunes resound with the snarl of pulsating engines and unadulterated joy of hordes of off-road enthusiasts.

Long holiday weekends attract what may be the largest crowds of ATV, dirtbike, and dune buggy riders anywhere in the world. The 165,000 this past Thanksgiving were far from a record. Old friends and extended families circle trailers and RVs to camp wagon-train style. It’s an off-road version of Burning Man, minus the carbon guilt.

Tom Coulombe, 48, of San Diego County, loves coming for “the dunes, the camaraderie, the people, the scene.” His 5- and 12-year-olds ride their own youth-model ATVs, an activity he describes as “very confidence-building.”

Trips to the dunes do end badly for some. On average, about six off-roaders die each year. Along with maps and guides at a ranger station, a brochure from Pioneers Memorial Hospital in Brawley helpfully announces: “Emergency Care…Closest ER.”

Riders appear to take the risks in stride, even humorously. “What is the craziest injury you have gotten at the dunes?!?” asked a recent post on a Facebook fan page for duners.

Though many accidents involve riders being thrown or crushed beneath ATVs, which typically weigh more than 600 pounds, manufacturers have successfully resisted a stability standard that could reduce the number of rollovers. Even so, riders almost uniformly blame tragedies on reckless conduct or dumb mistakes. Many seem fiercely protective of the manufacturers and contemptuous of liability claims—arguing, as the companies do, that only riders, not vehicles, are unsafe.

Injuries usually involve “idiots…riding over their heads,” said Coulombe, expressing a common view.  “They just bought these big machines. They’re not respecting them…Common sense has got to kick in.”

Not all tragedies involve inexperience or daredevil stunts, however. Last May at Oceano Dunes, for example, Christopher Meadows, 24, was crushed to death when his ATV flipped and landed on top of him. An emergency medical technician and volunteer with the search-and-rescue unit of the San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Department, Meadows was on his way to help an injured rider when his ATV tumbled down the steep face of a dune. “He was well-trained,” said Sgt. Mark Maki, Meadows’ supervisor, “and it still happened to him.” A month before Meadows’ death, Bill Orton, a former three-term congressman from Utah, was killed in west-central Utah when his ATV flipped and landed on him.

While battles between off-roaders and conservation groups draw the headlines, safety debates often turn vitriolic, too, raising the issue of how to regulate a product that is both risky and wildly popular—particularly when many users are below the age of informed consent. Many off-roaders bristle at attempts to restrict young riders, accusing safety advocates of usurping parental rights and their freedom to ride as a family.

“I have a drawer of hate mail over this issue,” says Rachel Weintraub, a senior attorney with the Consumer Federation of America who has campaigned for tougher regulations. “I’ve been accused of destroying the American family, and many other things.”

Robin Ingle, a health statistician with the US Consumer Product Safety Commission from 1998 to 2006, recalled some riders accusing the agency of “being the Taliban for trying to suggest some ways of dealing with the problem…It’s very eerie to be in the group of people who they view as the enemy.”

In recent months, the safety commission has focused on halting cheap imported ATVs that lack basic safety features, such as front brakes. The commission is also under a congressional directive to study whether youth-model ATVs are too powerful. Beyond that, for the last 20 years, the commission has done little but count casualties.

The agency took its boldest stand in 1987, when it filed a lawsuit against top distributors, declaring ATVs to be an “imminently hazardous consumer product.” In settling the case, the companies agreed to stop marketing three-wheel ATVs—considered more unstable than four-wheelers—but were spared the expense of recalling existing three-wheelers. The companies also agreed to expand consumer education, through prominent warning labels and free training with the purchase of a new ATV. However, the industry persuaded the commission not to require certain design changes, such as widening the stance of ATVs to reduce rollovers.

Casualty figures dropped or held steady for several years, but then rose sharply as ATVs grew in power and popularity. Injuries requiring emergency room treatment nearly tripled from 52,800 in 1997 to 150,900 in 2007, according to commission estimates.

As the statistician in charge of tracking ATV deaths, Ingle posted a map in her office and taped dots at the sites of fatal crashes. “West Virginia was obliterated,” she recalled. “It was covered by dots.” She left the agency in 2006, frustrated by its failure to stem the tide of accidents.

The blizzard of industry warning labels, which put the onus on riders to avoid mistakes and reckless conduct, became an important defense in lawsuits. Since most crashes could be blamed on one or more of the behaviors users were warned against, the companies had a “buffet of defenses” against almost any claim, said Ralph E. Chapman, a Mississippi-based plaintiffs’ lawyer.

“Never operate at speeds too fast for your skills or conditions,” one warning message states. Such advice is too vague to be useful, some critics contend, and is undermined by macho advertising claims, such as “Xtreme performance,” and “Now even more aggressive.”

Given the risk of rollover on steep or rocky ground, Ingle said the name, “all-terrain vehicle” is misleading in itself—they should be called “most terrain vehicles” or “some terrain vehicles,” she said.

Carol Pollack-Nelson, a psychologist formerly with the CPSC, said the situation illustrates the need to improve design of risky products, rather than rely mainly on warnings. “You have a product that’s inherently got some pretty serious dangers,” she said, noting that no one buys one “to drive their granny to the store…It goes fast, it goes over bumps, it goes over open terrain. Why else would they have bought the thing?”

• • •

The industry has opposed expanding federal regulations, arguing that the states are best able to police rider safety. But state regulations vary widely. For example, 21 states have no helmet laws while some others, including California, require helmets on public land only. Only four states bar use of adult ATV models by kids under 16, and several have no safety regulations at all.

Jim Suty, president of the four-wheeler group Friends of Oceano Dunes, said youngsters’ skills are best known to their parents, “so to put an arbitrary limit on age is ludicrous.” Suty, 42, said he sees no reason to treat ATV riding any differently from soccer and football, bike riding or climbing trees. Yet when it comes to ATVs, “the government is trying to parent my children and other children,” he complained.

“The sentiment among the ATV riders is that they ought to be able to determine independently what is safe for them and what is safe for their children,” said Elena Lopez-Gusman, executive director of the state chapter of the emergency physicians. “Our organization believes that there are some health and safety guidelines to prevent injuries, and it is the role of government to set some criteria for those, particularly when we’re talking about children—because our folks are the ones that see the direct consequences to peoples’ health and life and limb.”

The Specialty Vehicle Institute said it had been supportive of Maldonado’s legislation, and to prove it it provided a copy of a letter from the group to Maldonado. “We commend you in introducing the legislation,” said the Feb. 27, 2008, letter. Keeping kids off adult machines is something “we … adamantly support.” However, when FairWarning showed the letter to Dinora Ramirez, the Maldonado aide who managed the bill, she said she’d never seen it and couldn’t find it in her files. Ramirez said she didn’t know if it was lost in the mail or otherwise misplaced. Van Kleeck of the Specialty Vehicle Institute said she was certain the letter was sent.

In any case, while opposition lobbyists were frequently in touch with Maldonado’s office, Ramirez said representatives of the Specialty Vehicle Institute never visited or called. Van Kleeck said the institute tends to focus “on states that have no ATV safety legislation whatsoever,” and that “California does have a good safety law” as it stands.

And despite the Specialty Vehicle Institute’s professed support for the bill, several top ATV manufacturers—all members of the Institute—were on the opposing side, as members of the Off-Road Business Association. A national trade group based in Bakersfield, California, the association includes ATV dealers and four leading manufacturers: Yamaha Motor Corp. USA; Polaris Industries Inc.; Kawasaki Motors Corp. USA; and KTM North America Inc. “It makes me wonder how committed those companies are that they allowed their name to be on both sides of the issue,” said Lopez-Gusman of the emergency physicians.

Van Kleeck said the manufacturers supported the off-road association for defending access to off-road areas—not for “opposing safety legislation, because they unequivocally support that.”

“I guess you have to ask yourself, do they really believe in safety, especially children’s safety?” Foreman mused. “They could have helped out a lot more.”

This story originally appeared on FairWarning.org.


We have about a $200,000 funding gap and less than a week to go in our hugely important First $500,000 fundraising campaign. We urgently need your help, and a lot of help, this week so we can pay for the one-of-a-kind journalism you get from us.

Learn more in “Less Dreading, More Doing,” where we lay out this wild moment and how we can keep charging hard for you. And please help if you can: $5, $50, or $500—every gift from every person truly matters right now.

payment methods


We have about a $200,000 funding gap and less than a week to go in our hugely important First $500,000 fundraising campaign. We urgently need your help, and a lot of help, this week so we can pay for the one-of-a-kind journalism you get from us.

Learn more in “Less Dreading, More Doing,” where we lay out this wild moment and how we can keep charging hard for you. And please help if you can: $5, $50, or $500—every gift from every person truly matters right now.

payment methods

We Recommend


Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.