Corporate America’s Public Enemy No. 1: The EPA


On Monday, House oversight committee chair Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) released more than 100 letters he has received from corporations, trade groups, and associations outlining the regulations they’d like to see changed. The letters make clear that the Environmental Protection Agency is corporate America’s top target.

Issa solicited solicited lists of burdensome regs from the business community last month, and the early responses focused largely on environmental rules businesses would like to see axed. The Wall Street Journal got an early look a the letters, with includes dozens of gripes about the EPA’s current and proposed rules from 30 different organizations:

Groups complained about dozens of other proposed and existing EPA regulations in letters viewed by the Journal, including the agency’s plans to tighten limits on emissions of some pollutants from industrial boilers, ground-level ozone, mountain-top mining, cooling water intake structures, the level of nutrients in Florida waters, and pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay.

In all, Issa’s office released 1,947 pages of letters. Here’s a sample from William Kovacs, vice president of environment, technology and regulatory affairs at the US Chamber of Commerce, critiquing the overall impact of environmental regulation, not just individual rules it takes issue with:

In recent years, EPA seems to have increased both the breadth and the burden of its regulation of the business community. For whatever reason, it has largely spent the last 24 months attempting to modify, re-issue, or re-interpret virtually every controversial environmental regulatory decision of the past decade.

“Whatever reason” happens to be that the Obama administration has been actually trying to set rules based on science and public health, unlike the previous administration. On the question of limits on ozone pollution, which the Chamber takes issue with, the administration has indicated that it intends to take the advice of its scientists, which was ignored under Bush. And on greenhouse gas emissions, another Chamber target, the EPA has simply moved forward under the direction of the Supreme Court, after the Bush administration chose to ignore its obligation on that front.

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.