Occupy vs. Tea Party: The Google Smackdown

In the battle for America’s attention, the Occupy movement rocketed past the tea party this fall and remains in the lead, though not by much anymore. Here’s a chart from Google Trends comparing the dueling movements’ Google hits (top graph) and news mentions (bottom graph):

(The letters A-F are automatically generated by Google Trends)

Here’s my best guess of what accounts for the peaks:

A: Congress reaches a debt ceiling compromise, capping a wave of stories about the intransigence of the tea party caucus.

B: Citing sanitation concerns, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg threatens to evict Occupy Wall Street. But after occupiers scrub down the park and thousands of sympathizers turn out to defend them, the mayor backs down.

E: Occupy Wall Street is evicted.

So the occupy movement has gradually fallen off the front pages, but what about the political issues it brought to light? The following graphs suggest that “income inequality” continues to rival “federal debt” as a leading point of conversation, especially in the news media:

B: Culmination of the federal debt ceiling fight

D to E: The heyday of OWS coverage

F: Obama’s State of the Union address focuses on income inequality.

Though these charts have limits as barometers of public sentiment, the Occupy and tea party movements are clearly locked in a close race for attention. If anything, the charts might overstate the influence of the the tea party, which is getting a bump right now as the media obsesses over the GOP presidential primaries. And if Occupy makes good on its plans for an American Spring, it could easily hit the front pages again.

Of course, getting attention isn’t the same as getting results. Just ask Ron Paul, who easily bests his rivals in Google hits despite having virtually no chance of winning the GOP nomination. The question for activists and politicos is how grow the Occupy movement into a formula for change. The answer to that probably can’t be found on Google. 

Front page image: Roxanne Jo Mitchell; David Shankbone


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.