Here’s the Problem With Obama’s Health Care Fix: Insurance Companies

Obama’s plan to avert cancellations puts the power in the hands of the insurers.

Screenshot: White House feed

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


President Barack Obama announced a new administrative tweak to his health care law Thursday morning, an attempt to assuage the congressional Democrats who have been unnerved by the law’s botched rollout. He essentially offered a one-year reprieve to insurance companies. The White House will no longer prevent insurance companies from keeping customers enrolled in plans that don’t meet Obamacare’s minimum requirements of coverage. But his remedy for the raft of cancellation notices sent to consumers in the small individual market (dominated by junk plans) won’t solve the problem unless the president gets buy-in from the same insurance companies that initiated the problem.

“This fix won’t solve every problem for every person, but it’s going to help a lot of people,” Obama said, speaking in the White House briefing room.

Some House and Senate Democrats got skittish after millions of people received letters informing them that they’d lose their insurance thanks to Obamacare. This seemed to defy the president’s promise that “if you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) introduced a bill—cosponsored by six fellow Democrats—that would force insurers to continue their coverage in 2014 for people who already have those plans. In the House, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) proposed a bill that would allow insurers the license to continue selling these plans—many of which provide insufficient coverage—to anyone who wants them.

Obama, fearful that any congressional action on the Affordable Care Act would open the law to wider changes, is preempting legislation via executive fiat. The White House will send letters to state insurance commissioners, instructing them to allow insurance companies to sell plans for 2014 that don’t meet the minimum requirements dictated by the ACA. This exemption only applies to customers already enrolled in such plans. Unlike Upton’s bill, the president’s fix won’t allow new consumers to purchase these sub-standard insurance plans. The White House insists that this is just a one-year delay, and that health insurance companies will need to meet the minimum requirements come 2015. But will cancellation letters be less unacceptable next fall?

At first glance, the remedy might help the White House on the PR front. But many consumers who received cancellation letters still may not be able to keep their plans. That’s because the fix won’t accomplish anything unless insurance companies cooperate. The White House’s tweak will allow insurance companies to continue offering these plans in 2014; it doesn’t require them to. “They have the ability to reach back out to the folks they’ve canceled,” a senior White House official said during a conference call with reporters. But some insurance firms might not want to reach back to customers they’ve already canceled. They might not be willing to offer the same plan at the same price (insurance firms cancel policies and change premiums all the time—not only because of the ACA).

If insurance companies decide to keep offering these plans, the Obama administration will make it a painful process for these firms. Insurers who choose to keep these flawed plans must send their customers a letter that explains, in detail, what coverage is missing from the policy. These letters also must inform consumers that better options and subsidies are available within the Obamacare marketplaces. With all the rigmarole, insurance companies might not bother.

The reason these plans were canceled in the first place was that they were lousy. They might have been cheap, but they barely met basic insurance standards. These plans relied on consumer ignorance. Forcing insurance companies to spell out the lack of coverage could ensure that these cancellation notices stick—for the right reason.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the trade association of insurance firms, came out against the fix Thursday morning. “Premiums have already been set for next year based on an assumption of when consumers will be transitioning to the new marketplace,” the group’s president said in a statement. “If now, fewer younger and healthier people choose to purchase coverage in the exchange, premiums will increase and there will be fewer choices for consumers. Additional steps must be taken to stabilize the marketplace and mitigate the adverse impact on consumers.”

Obama’s fix may win him some political breathing room as the debate over Obamacare implementation continues. But it won’t change a fundamental fact: The insurance market is easily exploited by the insurance firms. And it likely won’t keep the foes of Obamacare from exploiting phony outrage over the cancellations to undo Obamacare. “I’m highly skeptical they can do this administratively,” House Speaker John Boehner said after news of Obama’s announcement leaked. “I just don’t see within the law their ability to do it.” The House is still scheduled to vote on Upton’s bill on Friday.

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate