August 18, 2016

Chicago’s Top Cop Wants 7 Officers Fired in Cover-Up of Fatal Shooting

Laquan McDonald was killed—some say executed—by police.

Superintendent Eddie Johnson.M. Spencer Green

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The head of the Chicago Police Department will ask the city’s police civilian review board to fire seven officers allegedly involved in covering up the fatal police shooting of black teenager Laquan McDonald back in October 2014, an incident the New York Times Editorial Board characterized as an execution.

Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson announced his decision on Thursday morning, just two days after the Chicago Inspector General’s office issued a report recommending that 10 officers involved in the alleged cover-up be fired or disciplined. Johnson stripped seven of the officers of police powers, but the review board must okay their ouster. Two more officers have already left the department: A deputy chief who signed off on a report justifying the shooting retired last week, and a lieutenant retired in May. Johnson said that he did not see sufficient evidence that the tenth officer did anything wrong.

Chief prosecutor Anita Alvarez came under attack for waiting more than a year to file charges against Officer Van Dyke.

The McDonald case came to the nation’s attention when a judge forced Chicago officials to release police footage of the incident. The footage showed Chicago officer Jason Van Dyke, who is white, shooting McDonald 16 times—several shots were fired while McDonald lay wounded on the ground. Van Dyke initially claimed the teen charged him with a knife. McDonald did have a knife, but the footage clearly shows him walking away from Van Dyke when the officer opened fire.

While the former officer was eventually charged with first-degree murder, the shooting and its bungling by city officials prompted national outrage and an investigation by the Department of Justice. A New York Times op-ed accused Mayor Rahm Emanuel of sitting on the video, which his office apparently received shortly after the shooting, because its release might have hurt Emanuel’s chances in a tight run-off election.

Chief prosecutor Anita Alvarez came under attack for waiting more than a year to file charges against Officer Van Dyke; she was voted out of office in March following a relentless protest campaign in which demonstrators showed up at her public speaking engagements. Emanuel fired former police superintendent Gary McCarthy last December. Johnson, the new superintendent, was appointed in April. Earlier this month, a judge appointed a special prosecutor to oversee the case against Van Dyke, rather than rely on prosecutor Alvarez, whose term expires in December.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate