The Obama Administration Is Still Targeting the Immigrants It Said It Wouldn’t Target

New government data shows enforcement in the field doesn’t match official policy.

<a href="http://www.zumapress.com/zpdwnld">Peggy Peattie</a>/San Diego Union-Tribune via ZUMA /20160524_zaf_s44_008.jpg?type=hires

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Two years ago, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it would look to deport only those undocumented immigrants who had committed serious crimes. Instead of targeting immigrants who posed little to no threat to public safety, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson directed ICE officials to focus their enforcement efforts on immigrants who had committed a felony or several misdemeanor offenses. 

As part of its new program, known as the Priority Enforcement Program, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement also planned to limit how often it asked local law enforcement to hold immigrants beyond their release dates. That type of request, known as a detainer request, has been criticized as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

But government data obtained this week by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reveals that ICE field officers have largely ignored those orders, continuing to target low-level offenders and immigrants who have never committed a crime. In the first two months of 2016, for example, more than half the detainer requests targeted immigrants with no criminal conviction. That’s actually an increase under the new program. Of those who did have a criminal conviction, drunk driving was the most common charge, and traffic offenses rank among the top five.

ICE spokeswoman Sarah Rodriquez told the Guardian that the agency could not comment on an analysis by an outside organization, but she said the agency continues to “make significant strides” in focusing its enforcement efforts on convicted criminals and people who pose a threat to public safety and national security.

You can read the full TRAC report here.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate