Trump Campaign Files Complaint in Nevada County With High Latino Turnout

But a Nevada judge is not buying it.

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Election Day, the Trump campaign filed a court challenge in the swing state of Nevada alleging ballots were cast illegally during early voting in heavily Latino Clark County. Due to surging Latino turnout in the county, which includes Las Vegas, certain polling sites were kept open to accommodate everyone who had lined up to cast a ballot. It’s a legally dubious strategy that seems aimed at laying the groundwork for claims that the election was rigged. Veteran Nevada reporter Jon Ralston dubbed the Trump team’s gambit the “‘Hispanics voted too much’ lawsuit.”

Nevada law allows anyone in line when the polls close to cast their ballot. But the Trump campaign alleged in a complaint filed with the Nevada secretary of state and the Clark County district court that early voters got in line after the polling locations technically closed.

At a hearing Tuesday, the Trump campaign asked that ballots from those early voting locations be impounded as evidence after the election. (Clark County responded that the Trump campaign was asking it to preserve records that would ordinarily be preserved anyway.) But a Clark County district judge denied the campaign’s request to have the early votes quarantined, as well as other record preservation requests from the campaign. The Trump campaign’s complaint with the Nevada secretary of state is still pending.

Ralston broadcast his dismay and incredulity over the case Tuesday.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate