The Feds Just Slammed One of the Country’s Biggest Private Prison Companies—Once Again

A new audit finds understaffing and overcrowding at a CoreCivic facility in Kansas.

Leavenworth Detention Center in 2016, before Corrections Corporation of America rebranded as CoreCivicOrlin Wagner/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Tuesday, the Justice Department slammed the private prison company CoreCivic and the US Marshals Service for poor oversight and severe understaffing at a Kansas maximum-security facility that holds federal detainees awaiting trial. These problems led to security risks and low morale, according to the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General, which released an audit of the Leavenworth Detention Center covering 2010 to 2015.

The scathing report comes two months after the Trump administration reversed the Obama administration’s decision to scale back the Justice Department’s use of private prisons following reports of security and administration problems in privatized facilities.

The audit found that CoreCivic, formerly known as the Corrections Corporation of America, struggled with periodic staffing shortages at Leavenworth. In September 2015, there was a 23 percent vacancy rate among correctional officers, who appeared to be leaving for higher-paying jobs with benefits. As a result, the audit found, CoreCivic required long-term mandatory overtime and had to shutter essential security posts, making it harder to respond to emergencies and control access in and out of the facility. The failure to “consistently fill these posts compromised its ability to run the facility in a safe and secure manner,” the auditors wrote.

“Rather than take steps to address understaffing,” the US Marshals Service and CoreCivic “exacerbated the problem,” the auditors added. The private prison company did not request extra help; instead, it sent some of its Leavenworth staffers to work at other lockups. In March 2015, for example, it transferred some of them to Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana, the subject of a Mother Jones investigation in which reporter Shane Bauer witnessed the prison’s staffing and security problems firsthand. CoreCivic wanted to shore up the safety situation at Winn, but the move left Leavenworth’s Special Operations Response Team, which responds to security emergencies, with just 4 members rather than the required minimum of 12. CoreCivic, the nation’s second-largest private prison company, told the Office of Inspector General that the understaffing at Leavenworth in 2015 was an “isolated incident.” It said the facility offered “among the highest correctional officer wages of CoreCivic’s institutions” and did not struggle to recruit officers.

The DOJ audit blasted the US Marshals Service for failing to hold CoreCivic accountable for this and other issues. Auditors found that the US Marshals Service was unaware that officials uninstalled beds at Leavenworth in 2011 to conceal from American Correctional Association (ACA) investigators that they were triple bunking inmates in cells designated for two people. The US Marshals Service official responsible for day-to-day monitoring was not based at the detention facility and received “no formal guidance.” “Field reports contained at most a single paragraph vaguely describing the results” and were in one instance completed after only an one-hour inspection. This lack of oversight may also be a problem at the 15 other contract detention facilities run by the US Marshals Service, the audit noted.

In response to these findings, the US Marshals Service said it would improve training of its oversight staff and create an onsite program to monitor its contracts at each of its privately run detention facilities. After the 2011 ACA investigation, CoreCivic created a program to train staffers to report misconduct, and in 2015 the US Marshals Service issued a memo prohibiting triple bunking. The private prison operator also told the Office of Inspector General that it had taken steps to improve CO recruitment and performance. “The safety and security of our facility, staff, and those entrusted to our care has consistently been our top priority,” it wrote in a 14-page memo attached to the Office of Inspector General report.

Last August, the Justice Department announced that it would phase out its use of private prisons after investigations found that they were less safe and effective than publicly run facilities. Previous audits by the Office of Inspector General had found that compared with federal facilities, CoreCivic prisons “had the highest rates of inmate fights and inmate assaults on other inmates.” In February, the Trump administration reversed the Justice Department’s stance on private prisons, saying it would continue to renew its contracts with private companies. (The Obama directive did not apply to the US Marshals Service, which is part of the Justice Department but does not fall under the purview of the Bureau of Prisons.) Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote that private prisons were necessary to “meet the future needs of the correctional system.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate