Trump Raises Russian Interference With Putin But Says It’s Time to Move On

The Russian view: Trump “accepted” Putin’s denial.

President Donald Trump speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Germany on Friday.Evan Vucci/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

President Donald Trump brought up Russian interference in the 2016 campaign with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their much-anticipated meeting on Friday at the G20 meeting in Germany, according to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. After Putin denied that Russia ran a covert operation to subvert the US election, Trump agreed to “move forward” and even to collaborate on cybersecurity, said Tillerson, who had been in the room. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who also attended the meeting, claimed that Trump accepted Putin’s assertion that Russia didn’t meddle in the election.

Trump “pressed [Putin] and then felt like at this point, ‘let’s talk about how to move forward,’” Tillerson told reporters after the meeting. He noted that Trump and Putin discussed the “challenges of cybersecurity” and agreed to set up a working group to develop an agreement that would allow the countries “to better understand how to deal with cybersecurity.” Trump and Putin, the secretary said, also “agreed to exchange further work regarding commitments” that Russia will not interfere in future elections in the United States and elsewhere. But Tillerson repeatedly noted that Trump had agreed put aside the issue of Moscow’s meddling in American democracy. “The question is what do we do now,” he said. In his account, Trump presented no warning to Putin regarding Russia’s information warfare against the United States. 

Meanwhile, US officials disputed Lavrov’s statement that Trump had accepted Putin’s claim Russia had nothing to do with interference in the US election. In his own press conference, Lavrov also said Trump told Putin “that in the US, as before, some groups are spreading—but can’t prove—the topic of Russian meddling in the US election.” Tillerson did not recount any such statement being made, but the sentiment of this alleged Trump remark certainly is in sync with what he has previously said publicly, suggesting the Trump-Russia scandal is a “hoax” and “fake news.”

US intelligence agencies agree that Putin oversaw a concerted Russian effort to interfere in the 2016 election in order to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. Russian-backed hackers broke into email accounts of Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign officials and then used Wikileaks to release emails designed to damage Clinton, the agencies concluded. Russians also created fake social media accounts to support Trump’s messaging and probed local election systems in at least 21 states, US officials say.

Trump has waffled on whether he accepts these conclusions, even as he faults former President Barack Obama for failing to do more to prevent Russian hacking.

Tillerson said Friday that Trump in his meeting with Putin “raised the concerns of the American people regarding Russian interference” in the election. That suggests that Trump did not personally endorse the view that Russia interfered.

Whatever Trump said on this front, it didn’t upset Putin. “The two leaders, I would say, connected very quickly,” Tillerson said. “There was a very clear positive chemistry between the two.” He added, “There was not a lot of relitigating of the past.”

Additional reporting by Hannah Levintova and Ashley Dejean.

THE BIG PICTURE

You expect the big picture, and it's our job at Mother Jones to give it to you. And right now, so many of the troubles we face are the making not of a virus, but of the quest for profit, political or economic (and not just from the man in the White House who could have offered leadership and comfort but instead gave us bleach).

In "News Is Just Like Waste Management," we unpack what the coronavirus crisis has meant for journalism, including Mother Jones’, and how we can rise to the challenge. If you're able to, this is a critical moment to support our nonprofit journalism with a donation: We've scoured our budget and made the cuts we can without impairing our mission, and we hope to raise $400,000 from our community of online readers to help keep our big reporting projects going because this extraordinary pandemic-plus-election year is no time to pull back.

THE BIG PICTURE

You expect the big picture, and it's our job at Mother Jones to give it to you. And right now, so many of the troubles we face are the making not of a virus, but of the quest for profit, political or economic (and not just from the man in the White House who could have offered leadership and comfort but instead gave us bleach).

In "News Is Just Like Waste Management," we unpack what the coronavirus crisis has meant for journalism, including Mother Jones’, and how we can rise to the challenge. If you're able to, this is a critical moment to support our nonprofit journalism with a donation: We've scoured our budget and made the cuts we can without impairing our mission, and we hope to raise $400,000 from our community of online readers to help keep our big reporting projects going because this extraordinary pandemic-plus-election year is no time to pull back.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.