Donald Trump is About to Gut Obamacare’s Free Birth Control

The administration would let virtually any company ditch contraception from its insurance coverage.

Olivier Douliery/AP

The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that federal health officials are set to finalize a new rule weakening Obamacare’s mandate that employers provide free contraception in insurance plans. The new rule will allow employers with religious or moral objections to ditch birth control coverage in employee insurance plans. 

Two sources familiar with the imminent rule told the Wall Street Journal that the final rule closely resembles a draft that was leaked to Vox in June. The wording in that leaked draft is such that, in practice, virtually any employer, not just an expressly religious organization, would be able to remove birth control coverage if contraception violates the organization’s “moral convictions”—a broad and murky standard.

In fact, a study released earlier this month by the left-leaning Center for American Progress (CAP) confirmed that for-profit companies have already sought to exploit an existing exemption for religious employers—an accommodation that is much narrower than the one soon to be finalized by the Trump administration. That exemption came out of Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby, the 2014 Supreme Court decision that allowed religious, for-profit companies to apply for a religious accommodation from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to be exempted from the contraceptive mandate. Through a Freedom of Information Act request to HHS, CAP found that more than half of the 45 requests for such accommodations came from for-profit companies, and many came from companies in industries that don’t explicitly deal with religion, including construction, agriculture, real estate, and tax services. 

“The data suggest that Trump’s new rule could open up the floodgates for nearly anyone to force women to either pay out of pocket or navigate hurdles to obtaining additional coverage for contraception,” said Jamila Taylor, senior fellow at CAP, in a press release. “President Donald Trump and [HHS] Secretary Tom Price are, in effect, saying to women that any employer’s personal views can decide whether or not you get birth control.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate