Support for More Immigration Reaches a Record High. Thank Donald Trump.

For the first time in more than 50 years, more Americans want to increase immigration than decrease it.

President Donald Trump tours a section of the border wall in Arizona last month.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

For the first time in more than 50 years of polling, Gallup has found that more Americans want to increase immigration than reduce it.

The obvious person to thank is President Donald Trump. His administration’s goal has been to slash immigration, both legal and unauthorized, but his persistently racist remarks and xenophobic actions have driven support for immigration among Democrats and independents to record highs. 

In a survey released Wednesday, Gallup found that a record-high 34 percent of Americans want more immigration to the United States, compared to 27 percent last June. The share who want to cut immigration fell from 35 percent to 28 percent during that period, the lowest level since Gallup began asking the question in 1965. A little more that a third of people believe immigration should stay at the current level, a proportion that’s remained relatively stable during Trump’s presidency.

The news that support for immigration has—once again—reached a new high under Trump comes as his administration is banning many immigrants and temporary workers from coming to the United States. In theory, the goal is to protect American workers who have lost their jobs during the pandemic from competition. In reality, Trump was already trying to drastically cut immigration while he was boasting about record lows in unemployment. 

During his 2016 campaign for president, Trump repurposed a song written by a Black civil rights activist so that he could compare immigrants to deceitful snakes who bite their naive hosts. In the White House, Trump turned that rhetoric into policy. He cut refugee admissions to record lows, separated families at the border, terrorized undocumented immigrants with Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests, and made it harder to come to the United States legally. With four months left until the November election, the pandemic has allowed him to largely succeed in bringing immigration to a halt. But it’s come at an obvious cost to the viability of the modern nativism movement he used to his political advantage four years ago.

As I reported last year, Democrats and Republicans used to feel the same way about immigrants: Nearly two-thirds agreed they were a burden, according to the Pew Research Center. That consensus disappeared well before Trump declared his candidacy by calling Mexican immigrants “rapists.” Now the president has pushed the partisan divide over immigration to new levels, making it exceedingly unlikely that Congress will cut immigration anytime soon.

At the start of the Trump era, 35 percent of Democrats and 21 percent of independents believed immigration should be increased. Now those totals have reached 50 percent and 34 percent, respectively. In exchange for those massive increases in support, Trump hasmaybe—succeeded in making Republicans slightly less likely to support more immigration. It’s hard to know: The 2 percent shift away from backing more immigration among Republicans is within Gallup’s margin of error. It’s not exactly the art of the deal.  

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate