UN: Sexual Violence Occurred in October 7 Attacks and Against Hostages

The full scope “may take months or years to emerge.”

A UN inquiry led by Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict Pramila Patten found that sexual violence occurred against Israelis, and also heard allegations of sexual violence perpetrated by Israeli officials and settlers against Palestinians.Lev Radin/Pacific Press/Sipa/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A United Nations inquiry found “reasonable grounds” to believe sexual violence—including rape and gang rape—occurred during the Hamas-led October 7 attack, as well as “clear and convincing information” it occurred against Israeli hostages, according to a report released today, following a group of experts’ weeks-long trip to the region.

The experts—led by UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Pramila Patten—also visited the city of Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank, and heard concerns about allegations of sexual violence perpetrated by Israeli officials and settlers against Palestinians in detention, in their homes, and at checkpoints, according to the UN statement. (The UN team didn’t visit the Gaza Strip due to “the ongoing hostilities” and the fact that there are other UN teams there that address sexual and gender-based violence, their statement said.)

The news comes as reports of sexual violence on October 7 have become a source of controversy in the context of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, which the Hamas-run Health Ministry says has killed more than 30,300 Palestinians, the majority of whom are women and children, according to the latest figures reported by the Associated Press. As I reported last month, protesters confronted former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield at a Columbia University event focused on sexual violence in conflict, alleging that they were “exploiting sexual violence” to justify Israel’s military actions. The UN also previously came under fire by critics—including former Meta executive Sheryl Sandberg—who in December alleged that the body wasn’t adequately confronting reports of sexual violence on October 7.

The UN visit to the region didn’t establish how prevalent the sexual attacks were on or after October 7 and doesn’t count as a formal investigation, which will fall to other UN bodies, according to Patten’s office. The report also does not “draw conclusions on attribution of alleged violations to specific armed groups,” given that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups—including the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Popular Resistance Committees—have claimed responsibility for the attacks (though Hamas has denied allegations of rape). The report suggests “other armed elements and armed and unarmed civilians” were also present during the attacks. Determining who is directly responsible for the sexual violence would fall to further investigation, the report notes. (But it also says Israel has declined to cooperate with other UN agencies that would carry out such an investigation.) 

The visit lasted from January 29 to February 14, and consisted of a group of experts who held more than 30 meetings with Israeli officials and security forces and visited four locations that were sites of the October 7 attacks and the morgue that held victims’ bodies, among others, according to information provided by the UN. The team also conducted 34 confidential interviews with survivors and witnesses of the October 7 attacks, as well as released hostages, first responders, and health and service providers, and reviewed more than 5,000 images and about 50 hours of footage. 

“The mission team spared no effort to gather information and to encourage victims/survivors and witnesses to come forward and share their stories,” said the statement from Patten’s office.

That effort found that “clear and convincing information that sexual violence, including rape, sexualized torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment has been committed against hostages,” and that there are “reasonable grounds to believe that this violence may be ongoing.” They also found “there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred” in at least three locations during the October 7 attacks. “In most of these incidents, victims first subjected to rape were then killed, and at least two incidents relate to the rape of women’s corpses,” the UN added. 

The team also found “a pattern of victims, mostly women, found fully or partially naked, bound, and shot across multiple locations” that they said may indicate “some forms of sexual violence.” 

There were also some reported alleged rapes that the team could not verify, and there were at least two allegations of sexual violence that had been “widely reported in the media” that the team said were unfounded, including one “highly publicized allegation of a pregnant woman whose womb had reportedly been ripped open before being killed, with her fetus stabbed while still inside her,” according to the report.

The UN team also noted that, in spite of its efforts, “the true prevalence of sexual violence [on Oct. 7]…may take months or years to emerge and may never be fully known,” due to various challenges to gathering evidence of sexual violence, including the large number of casualties; the quick burials of the dead; the loss of evidence; “inaccurate and unreliable forensic interpretations by non-professionals”; the difficulty of getting in touch with survivors; and “the intense media scrutiny of individuals whose accounts have appeared in the public domain, increasing trauma and fears of social stigmatization.”

Though the statement didn’t mention specific media reports, a December New York Times report purporting to examine allegations of sexual violence on October 7 has attracted significant controversy from inside the Times and from readers, who pointed to discrepancies in some of the accounts the story was based on, according to the Intercept. The Times writers addressed some of the critiques in a follow-up story. But another story published by the Intercept last week cast more doubt on the reporting, alleging that an Israeli freelancer who was one of the three reporters who authored the piece had no prior reporting experience, struggled to find corroborating evidence for the claims presented in the story, and had previously “likedposts on X calling for Gaza to be turned into a slaughterhouse, which she subsequently claimed was an accident. (A Times spokesperson told the Intercept that “those ‘likes’’ are unacceptable violations of our company policy.” The paper has also previously said it stands by its reporting.) 

In its coverage of today’s UN report, the Times said its prior reporting “did not refer to the specific allegations that the U.N. said were unfounded.” 

The UN said that, during its visits to the West Bank on two separate days, officials described various forms of sexual violence facing some of the nearly 9,000 Palestinians detained in Israeli custody, including invasive body searches, forcing women to remove their hijabs, threats of rape, prolonged forced nudity, and sexual harassment. The UN team said it raised those allegations of harassment and sexual violence in Israeli detention with Israeli officials, who claimed that “to date, no complaints of sexual violence by members of the Israeli Defense Forces have been received,” according to the report.

Scholars and journalists have previously documented similar allegations, chronicling Palestinian men’s and women’s experiences of sexual violence while detained by Israeli forces, and sexual harassment of Palestinian women at Israeli checkpoints

The report also notes that while officials in the occupied West Bank did not report any incidents of rape, “Palestinian women’s organizations consistently stressed that in addition to intimidation and insecurity, the high level of stigmatization, conservative cultural norms and the power imbalance in the context of occupation impedes reporting of sexual violence.” 

In issuing the summary of the findings, Patten called for a ceasefire—which Vice President Kamala Harris also called for yesterday—as well as the release of all hostages held by Hamas. Patten also said Israel should support the UN’s “fully fledged independent investigations into all alleged violations.” 

Correction, March 15: This post has been updated to note that while the UN report established “reasonable grounds to believe” sexual violence occurred on October 7, it did not establish that Hamas members were necessarily the perpetrators, and noted instead that “other armed groups” also took part, and that attribution would require further investigation. This post has also been updated with information about the standards of proof of sexual violence used in the UN report.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate