The “Delicate, Beautiful, Tiny” Fascism of Kristi Noem

The right thinks Noem is the victim of Sen. Padilla’s assault. But what about Rep. McIver?

Photo collage of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem speaking in front of a prison in El Salvador on the right and Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J. exiting a detention prison on the left

Mother Jones illustration; Angelina Katsanis/AP, Alex Brandon/AP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

As quickly as condemnation poured in over the forcible removal of Sen. Alex Padilla from a Department of Homeland Security press conference on Thursday, the right appeared to identify a different victim.

Kristi Noem, who, in her characteristic makeup and baseball cap, had been delivering a speech defending the president’s deployment of the military in Los Angeles, when Padilla, a Latino man and elected official, started to approach the podium. He is heard, despite what DHS falsely claimed after the incident, stating his identity. Still, at least four men are seen quickly pouncing on Padilla, shoving him out the door, while Noem continued with her prepared remarks.

But to the right, Noem was the wrong party. For them, the incident seems to have transformed her into something of a wounded dove by the incident. “She’s like the most delicate, beautiful, tiny woman,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) said during an appearance on Benny Johnson’s podcast. She also took a shot at Padilla’s manhood. “What actual testosterone dude goes in and tries to break Kristi Noem?”

Break Noem? Padilla may have been there to call out cruelty. But the senior senator from California was not there to break anyone. That a woman who sits atop an agency ruthlessly profiling and deporting immigrants, and in some cases, sending them to a Salvadoran gulag with no due process, is suddenly unable to be confronted by an elected official without them being physically assaulted is risible. Yet, Noem’s rise to power has long seemed to rely on this intentional contradiction: perfectly styled hair while deriding caged immigrants in the background; heavily caked makeup while tagging along for made-for-TV immigration raids; tough on crime but “delicate, beautiful, tiny.” As I wrote in a recent piece, it is the push for regressive gender roles by an increasingly fascist administration.

But conservative gender norms have nothing on the glaring racism in the suggestion that Noem, a white woman, is the victim after a Latino man is physically dragged out of a room by multiple Secret Service agents. The pretext of criminality attached to people who are not white pervades this administration. Just this week, Rep. LaMonica McIver, a Black congresswoman from New Jersey, was indicted on charges of impeding and interfering with law enforcement officials after protesting at an ICE facility last month. The charges, which carry a maximum of 17 years in prison, come despite shifting explanations from the Trump administration about what led to McIver’s arrest. McIver has condemned the charges as politically motivated; as the New York Times reported, far-right groups have since targeted McIver with intense racism online.

Both incidents, Noem’s press conference and McIver’s arrest, underscore with acute clarity the racist themes that animate this administration. In these early days of our fascist slide, it is painfully clear who gets to be “delicate, beautiful, and tiny,” and who is seen as a violent threat to law enforcement.

DECEMBER IS MAKE OR BREAK

A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. That’s risky, because a strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength—but a weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again—any amount today.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

DECEMBER IS MAKE OR BREAK

A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. That’s risky, because a strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength—but a weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again—any amount today.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate