« Michael J. Fox: He's Our Man | Blog Index | Green Groups Get Local »
Tennessee RNC Attack Ad Pulled: Blame Canada?
What got that racist anti Harold Ford attack ad pulled off the air? Was it complaints from NAACP? The DNC? Or was it our neighbors to the north? This, from a Canadian news station:
It's not often Canadians care about who's running for the U.S. Senate. But when we figure prominently in one of those quintessential American-style attack ads, nearly everyone on this side of the border sits up and takes notice.
A fierce fight between a Tennessee Republican candidate and his Democratic opponent has gotten personal - and Canada is right in the middle of it.
The controversial commercial from right wing candidate Bob Corker attacks a man named Harold Ford. It features supposedly ordinary citizens commenting on the Democrat, indicating he'll increase taxes and take guns out of the hands of residents, two huge issues in the south. There's also a shot of a rather questionable young woman who claims she's spent time with Ford at "The Playboy Club". But it's the next statement that seems to have rankled many. It comes from a comment made about some recent controversial nuclear tests.
"Canada can take care of North Korea," a man who resembles a young Wilfrid Brimley jokes. "They're not busy." The suggestion that we aren't pulling our weight in the world - and the fact that we've lost 42 soldiers in Afghanistan - is never mentioned.
The commercial, which has already been part of an equally nasty campaign between Ford and Corker, has been the subject of a protest by Canada's Ambassador to the U.S. And that complaint has apparently led to action.
Officials in Tennessee have agreed to pull the offending advertisement. But the U.S. Ambassador to this country has a response to our anger. He notes Canadian ads during the last election treated U.S. President George Bush with far more contempt and no one really issued any major complaints about those.
Posted by Clara Jeffery on 10/26/06 at 5:08 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
"He notes Canadian ads during the last election treated U.S. President George Bush with far more contempt and no one really issued any major complaints about those."
There was nothing to complain about.
George W. Bush is far more worthy of contempt.
Posted by: Casey on 10/27/06 at 11:46 AM
"But the U.S. Ambassador to this country has a response to our anger. He notes Canadian ads during the last election treated U.S. President George Bush with far more contempt and no one really issued any major complaints about those."
As a matter of fact, it might interest the U.S. ambassador to Canada to know that former PM Martin of Canada ran a very anti-American, anti-Bush, anti-NAFTA campaign last time out, and as I recall, was defeated by Mr. Harper in part on that platform. Turns out the Canadians actually like us Americans in spite of ourselves (through they are baffled by our choice of presidents, sometimes) and most rejected the anti-U.S. tone of the Liberal's campaign, and think that NAFTA has been good for them. It's nice to know that the U.S. ambassador to Ottawa who complained about the Canadian campaign is as much a dunce as the rest of this administration. Perhaps he is an expert in Arabian horses?
Posted by: John in Louisiana on 10/29/06 at 2:43 PM
ARCHIVE
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
January 7, 2007 - January 13, 2007
December 31, 2006 - January 6, 2007
December 24, 2006 - December 30, 2006
December 17, 2006 - December 23, 2006
December 10, 2006 - December 16, 2006
December 3, 2006 - December 9, 2006
November 26, 2006 - December 2, 2006
RECENT COMMENTS
If Only a Doping Scandal Could Mean Victory in Iraq (6)
Elizabeth wrote:
I think John is being facetious, at least I hope so. And I...
[more]
Lawmakers Have a Sense of Humor About This "Paying For Sex" Business (1)
Gotcha wrote:
"only to watch the color drain from the faces of unsuspect...
[more]
How Do You "Make" a Terrorist Threat? (2)
Nomo Jo wrote:
The Thought Police are apparently well-funded and hard at ...
[more]
Political Trivia for July 26 (2)
Nicholas Beaudrot wrote:
Sounds right to me. I almost forgot about the Poland joke ...
[more]
Survey: Muslim Support for Suicide Bombings Declining (5)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
John,
It wouldn't take much. The IRA already bombs people...
[more]
Alabama: Where the Constitution and DNA Don't Matter (2)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
I have a number of issues with the death penalty despite n...
[more]
Dick Morris, Breaking Big Stories. Fred Thompson, Playing the Dirty Money Game (16)
JT Barrie wrote:
"Squeaky Clean" always follows the cleric's rule of thumb...
[more]
Bush/Cheney Threats to the Endangered Species Act (1)
lorsajon wrote:
I pray that Senator McCain gets involved in this because h...
[more]
Leaked Army Karbala Report Shows Iraqi Police Collaborated in Ambush on US Troops (3)
charlie jacksonn wrote:
There is suspicion, by the locals, that the attack was ca...
[more]
FEMA's Post-Brown Efficiency Melts Away (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
I remember at the time the ice was just sitting that conse...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org
U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records
www.PublicRecordsInfo.com
Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com
Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as
Well as County Property Records Search.
www.PublicRecordsIndex.com














No objection to treating Bush with contempt? Maybe because he's deserving of it, eh?
He certainly has my contempt. Once upon a time I thought Nixon was as low as we could go in picking a President. I am sorry to learn that I was wrong.
Posted by: Deacon on 10/27/06 at 7:48 AM