MoJo Blog

« Giuliani Flip-Flop-Flips on Public Funding for Abortions | Blog Index | John Walker Lindh Asks for Shorter Sentence in Light of Hicks Plea Deal »

Giuliani Flip-Flop-Flips on Flat Tax

Rudy Giuliani is was one of the GOP's strongest opponents to a flat tax. When Steve Forbes was running for president on the idea in 1996, Rudy "disparaged a flat tax in general and Mr. Forbes's plan in particular," according to the New York Times. Rudy said a flat tax "would really be a disaster."

But what's a disaster between presidential candidates? In exchange for Steve Forbes' endorsement, Giuliani recently announced he was a big proponent of the flat tax. He said of a federal income tax, "maybe I'd suggest not doing it at all, but if we were going to do it, a flat tax would make a lot of sense."

Okay, so that's a flip-flop. Care to reverse your position again, and make it a flip-flop-flip?

[When asked how he could support a flat tax after long opposition, Giuliani said,] "I didn't favor it, I said something academic... What I said was, and it was not a joke, but it was half-jocular, was if we didn't have an income tax...what would I favor? First I would favor no tax. That would be my first position. My second position would probably be a flat tax."
But, he said, the tax "would probably not be feasible."

I love this attitude. Can you imagine him as president? "Oh, did I say we should bomb Iran? I was kidding. But kidding on the square. I was, like, half kidding. Oh, Ahmadinejad launch an attack on Israel as a response? Crap. You're kidding, right?"

The problem with Giuliani, and maybe this is a good problem, is that he isn't comfortable flip-flopping. McCain panders to people he once despised and Romney has reversed his entire playbook on social issues -- and both are sticking to their reversals, no matter how shameless or false they appear, and no matter how hard they get hammered for it. Giuliani, on the other hand, seems uncomfortable abandoning positions he has long held, and after he abandons them, he claims them back, or gets hopelessly muddled.

Maybe that's to his credit.

More on this at Bruce Reed's space on Slate. Also, Cameron blogged about the flat tax and Giuliani's relationship to the crooked Bernard Kerik in an earlier post titled "Giuliani Meltdown."

Posted by Jonathan Stein on 04/05/07 at 8:02 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

First, I'd like to state that I have absolutely no problem with someone changing their mind in light of new data or as the result of increased learning and experience. This is what intelligent humans do.

That said, going back and forth like this in the space of one interview is moronic at best. Further, the flat tax, being non-progressive, is something to which I am strongly opposed.

I believe I should pay more, both as a total and as a percentage of my income, than someone who makes less than I do. That's a big part of what being liberal (i.e. generous) means.

What bothers me tremendously is that the very wealthy do not pay their fair share. Perhaps what is required is a system with no deductions and no tax-free income. Set the rates a bit lower. Create a nice simple form where we enter total income, look up our percentage, multiply one by the other and pay that amount. Done.

With this plan, I'd stop subsidizing other peoples' children, though still pay for schooling. Renters would stop subsidizing my mortgage. People who don't contribute to charity would stop funding the contributions of those who do, etc.

But, the topic was Giuliani's beliefs, or lack thereof. So, he can't make up his mind about a little thing like taxes. Do we really need someone who can make a decision in the white house?

One more aside: He does not even have the support of the NYC Fire Department!!

Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 04/05/07 at 9:17 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote: The testimony was a complete mess. ... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote: Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul... [more]

Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote: Kirilovslogic, Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th... [more]

NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote: Sneezer, First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is... [more]

MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote: You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani... [more]

Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote: Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote: The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ... [more]

Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote: I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t... [more]

White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote: It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment.... [more]

Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Yes, Dan.... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS