«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Maybe GOP Voters Should Consult New Yorkers for Thoughts on Rudy
The New York Daily News has conducted a poll in which it asked New Yorkers who they thought was a better mayor and a better potential president -- current Mayor Michael Bloomberg or former Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
The results? Bloomberg in a landslide. For both.
Who is/was a better mayor -- Bloomberg 56%, Giuliani 29%.
Who would make a better president -- Bloomberg 46%, Giuliani 29%.
Now I know that New York is a heavily Democratic city, but if America's love affair with Rudy Giuliani is based on the fact that he "protected us" or "showed us strength" on 9/11, what does it say if the people who needed protection most, and who needed to see strength the most, don't like the man? Shouldn't it be a requirement if running for office that the last people you governed are satisfied with your performance?
Actually, if that was the case, Romney and McCain would be out too.
Bill Richardson and Hillary Clinton would be just fine. For some reason, I can't find numbers on Obama, but I'd bet he's doing just fine in his home state.
Update: Yes, I know Bloomberg is technically a Republican, but he was a life-long Democrat before he ran and is about as liberal as any "Republican" can be. He's well-liked across party lines because of his effectiveness. That's why I once called him post-partisan.
Comments
Wait, I thought you were the guy who doesn't trust polls? Just kidding.
To reiterate a point I've made here before (some people are probably sick of it by now), look at Bill Richardson's appeal to Republicans and Independents as compared to Clinton's. Then explain to me why Hilary is leading the pack.
This is especially interesting when you consider that NY's "independents" are probably more left-leaning, whereas NM's "independents" are probably more right-leaning.
Bill Richardson sounds pretty good on the environment. I'd be curious to know what he thinks of nuclear power. He, of all the candidates, should be aware of the issues of storing nuclear waste.
The environment is the single most important issue to me, bar none.
That said, *, are you stating that you think that Bill Richardson leaning toward the right is a good thing? Not to me. I'm looking for a strong liberal. The center is so far to the right these days that it's literally scary to me. When people in today's center thing that The New York Times is "a liberal rag" and I know that it is still just slightly RIGHT of center, I get nervous. I'm looking first for an environmentalist, second for a liberal. Since the two have a tremendous overlap, I expect not to have to choose between these ideals.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 05/14/07 at 6:57 PM Respond
Oh, and, as a New Yorker, I agree with the poll. El Duce may be the least bad on the Republican side. I hope he gets the nomination. I also hope he loses.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 05/14/07 at 7:01 PM Respond
Scott,
I'm strictly talking about chances of victory in the general election. I think Richardson's appeal to the center and disillusioned conservatives make him a lock for a general election victory. I understand that the far left would be less happy voting for Richardson than Kucinich, but they will vote for whomever the Dems nominate at this point. That makes Richardson a lock to win. I also think that Richardson would be a better president than any of the other candidates, but I'm also not a Democrat.
Understand, I'm not saying that Richardson is the only Democratic candidate who can win. After eight years of Republican corruption and incompetence at the executive level, it's the Democrat's election to lose. But if I were a Democratic voter, I'd prefer to take the sure thing at this point. I think Hillary stands a good chance of losing in the general election if she is the Democratic nominee.
Posted by: * on 05/15/07 at 4:03 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
October 5, 2008 - October 11, 2008
September 28, 2008 - October 4, 2008
September 21, 2008 - September 27, 2008
September 14, 2008 - September 20, 2008
September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
August 31, 2008 - September 6, 2008
August 24, 2008 - August 30, 2008
August 17, 2008 - August 23, 2008
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
RECENT COMMENTS
Palin Report: The Mavericky Governor "Abused Her Power" (9)
Greg Varra wrote:
The last 8 years has proven justification can and will be ...
[more]
Debate II—McCain Offers a Man; Obama Offers More (42)
Claus-Erik Hamle wrote:
Obama said he wouldn´t allow the UN to Veto a US attack on...
[more]
Fear-Mongering and Fox (15)
Still a 60s radical wrote:
Don't take Bill Nigh seriously. He and Kathy are just sad ...
[more]
The Long Saga of John McCain and the NRA (8)
Matt wrote:
The gun issue isn't nearly as important since the Supreme ...
[more]
George W. Bush: Helping Candidates Lose Election in Other Countries, Too (2)
classwarrior wrote:
Actually, the Conservatives were a minority goverment befo...
[more]
Jim Crow's Muslim America (8)
MissouriMom wrote:
You know, you can find crackheads, alcoholics, racists and...
[more]
Sarah Palin's Secret Emails (250)
tom wrote:
your an idiot. you know nothing about the constitution. ...
[more]
"Arabs Tend to Wear Red Shirts," Said the Man in the Red Shirt (12)
vanessa wrote:
You are very welcome. It can be hard to get information. I...
[more]
Calendars Show Gov. Palin's Foreign Policy Experience: About 20 Meetings for About 12 Hours (28)
JNH88KR wrote:
Maybe we should ask the average Iraqi citizen on the stree...
[more]
The First Obama-McCain Debate: Not as Telling as Real Life (48)
Rustan wrote:
Dear All,
It certainly comes down towards the end of the ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: * on 05/14/07 at 6:42 PM Respond