«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Reason 4,321 To Hate Wal-Mart

Panties found by a reader of Feministing.com in a North Carolina Wal-Mart—in the section that caters to 12-year-old girls.
After Feministing posted the photo and it made its way through the blogosphere, Fox News reported on Wednesday that outraged parents had prompted Wal-Mart to pull the $2.96 panties off the shelves.
Comments
Don't you mean: hate the people who would buy such products?
But I suppose it's easier to hate a faceless corporation than holding individuals responsible for their own actions, no?
The message is good - credit cards get a LOT of people in trouble. However, the placement of the message is questionable.
Posted by: Gary on 12/14/07 at 10:12 AM Respond
Let's see... Who would buy such a thing?
Would it be the twelve year old girl with a twenty dollar a week allowance?
Now granted, it would be the parent's fault for turning a blind eye, but wouldn't some of the blame also go to the provider of the product? 'Cause you know the cashier isn't saying to the twelve year old girl, "you can't buy those because they purvey a message of sexual innuendo".
We don't blame the kids when a drug pusher sells them drugs. Why? Because they aren't responsible for the choices they make. Who do we punish? The pusher.
So I say, let's punish the one who pushes crap on our kids. Let's do what I already do, let's all boycott Wal-Mart.
Posted by: ChaxC on 12/14/07 at 10:17 AM Respond
hahaha....I think Gary missed the point.
Look at the typical clientele of Wal-Mart. Of course they are going to buy things like this. Once white trash, always white trash.
Posted by: Grace on 12/14/07 at 1:03 PM Respond
the problem is that wal-mart posits themselves as a "family" corporation with strong republican roots and sensibilities. they can sell those underwear or they can continue to represent themselves as a family-values based business (censored versions of cds and dvds, anybody?), but not both. then again, does the average wal-mart shopper give a crap about the politics of wal-mart? maybe not...
Posted by: nmc on 12/14/07 at 2:39 PM Respond
@ jkp: why are you so eager to defend Wal-Mart? Do you work for Wal-Mart? Do you own Wal-Mart stock? Are you philosophically pro-corporate-power?
In addition to "hating" the people "who would buy such products," why can't we also hate the people who came up with such products, promote them and profit from them?
Wal-Mart is one of those people. It may not have a face, but it is a legal person with a hell of a lot more power than you or I will ever have. Why is someone always trying to let the big fish off the hook?
Posted by: Mike on 12/14/07 at 3:27 PM Respond
I think Wal-Mart walk's a fine line, in terms of being edgy and American style and family freindly. They sell stuff that's contemporary...I dont know. Me,I'd like to go to Wal-Mart and get my groceries and also some low end, high quality bondage gear.You wonder what Sam Walton would think of that?
Posted by: Franklin on 12/14/07 at 6:31 PM Respond
Come on Franklin contemporary is not quite the right word just cause they got a collection of the world biggest pile of misc. crap u don't REALLY need but THINK you want. Although it is true they are the largest seller of ORGANICS-in the world, much less basically control the general produce market. Consider the movie WALMART-The High Cost of Low Prices-, which pretty much lays it on the line. A qoute from a poor asian woman after an 18hour sweat shift with no air in a room packed with 100's of workers for a couple measly bucks said'Respectable customer, why do you think your prices are so low??" A chunk of ice the size of Alaska melts in one year (apox 1/5 of what's left)and here I am wrting my time away @ a pair of absurd panties created by a corp. with nothing less to do than burn away the last fringe of culture before the market spins out of control due to the waste and profittering they created to sell one more glob of chem;s for 2.96, sad... Shop at Walmart for one thing only...a map out of the town where it is your best option for anything, particularly groceries/food, buy local, buy fresh.
Posted by: BoundLESS-E on 12/14/07 at 11:27 PM Respond
The unstated part of the message:
"Who needs credit cards when you've got a pussy?"
That's why the panties are inappropriate for 12-year-olds. (Or even 30-year-olds, for that matter.)
Posted by: Paul Chen on 12/15/07 at 10:51 AM Respond
What I like about Wal-Mart is that A.)they give job's to people whom would be unemployable in a standard retail enviornment i.e. White kids covered in tatoos and studs and of couse the Brother's from downtown and B}the classless element of shopping there.No middleclass people looking down their nose at you because one work's outdoors for a living and likes camoflage clothing. No one put's on airs at Wal-Mart,it's my America, plus I shop at 5 Am to see less Americans. If they want to sell crotch-less panties to 10 year's old's, that really doesnt bother me too much.
Posted by: Franklin on 12/15/07 at 3:46 PM Respond
As if Mattel wasn't bad enough for you people...literally poisoning your children with generous coatings GHB and toxic levels of lead on toys bought at Walmart! Now they (corporations) are literally poisoning the mental health of your children with messages such as that on underwear. I would love to watch a politician try to defend the right of the corporation to market such a product. I suppose the only way to get a Republican family-minded business man's attention would be to put the same message on a pair of boy's briefs...hahaha. Seriously, wake up, you dolts, watch the movie and stop buying crap from a crap supplier. Merry Christmas.
Posted by: Glenn Brandham on 12/15/07 at 5:14 PM Respond
Well I work at Walmart and I can tell you its not all bad. Yea you have stupid junk like those panties, which are offensive to me cause I'm a prudish 23 year old married woman, but they do as one commenter stated. They give jobs to people who wouldn't have jobs otherwise. AKA....college students who NEED to work the nights and the late shift because they take classes during the day. They also give jobs at a better pay rate than most of us small-town residents can find elsewhere. The pay rate for a Factory worker in my town is $8 per hour. The pay rate that I, as a brand new employee, earn is $7 per hour. For the first four years of my work history in this town I earned at the most...$6.25 per hour. How's that for crappy earnings.
But don't blame the everyday employee because of what the corporation does....blame capitalism itself. And the oversexed teens of the millennium.
Posted by: Minda on 05/05/08 at 6:37 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Reason 4,321 To Hate Wal-Mart (12)
Minda wrote:
Well I work at Walmart and I can tell you its not all bad....
[more]
RumInt: New Bush Iran Finding? (11)
MarthaA wrote:
It's the REPUBLICAN/DLC war "Project For The New American ...
[more]
Politics, Pandering, and Policy at the Pump: Who Wins? (24)
Bob wrote:
Posted by: Dawn on 05/05/08 at 4:34 PM
The problem with ...
[more]
Rev. Wright: A Neverending Cross for Obama To Bear (89)
Aaron wrote:
Marcus, the truth from Pastor Wright or the Honorable Mini...
[more]
Lawmakers Continue to Push for Investigation of Pentagon Puppets (2)
MarthaA wrote:
It's REPUBLICAN/DLC corporate communism. Communism used f...
[more]
The Weekly Standard Does Not Have the Democrats' Best Interests At Heart (7)
MarthaA wrote:
Michael Z:
That's because Hillary and Bill are Republican...
[more]
Clinton on Iraq: Got Some Explaining to Do? (2)
MarthaA wrote:
Hillary Clinton switched to her current position because s...
[more]
Awkward Sports Metaphor of the Day (2)
MarthaA wrote:
When Hillary Clinton says "we" she definitely doesn't mean...
[more]
NYC's New Reefer Madness (22)
Paul Miller wrote:
I think it's amazing that Guav sites a comment by his wife...
[more]
John McCain's Miserable Record on Hurricane Katrina (24)
M. Taylor wrote:
Considering what Berry Wallace wrote, it still stands to s...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: jkp on 12/14/07 at 8:19 AM Respond