Bling Dynasty: Enter the Dragon
How China is picking over America's carcass.
Wang Jianxi is the picture of an investment banker—close-cropped hair, owlish glasses, crisp business suits. A vice president of Beijing's $200 billion state-controlled investment fund, he travels in the same rarefied circles as the men and women of Goldman Sachs, ubs, and other Western financial giants. In their company, he goes by "Jesse." And like any savvy banker, Jesse knows the value of PR. As China Investment Corporation was getting off the ground in 2007, Wang hit the Western conference circuit to insist that the fund—governed by a group of senior Communist Party members—would have no political leanings. He cruised from one American think tank to the next, delivering lectures on the global economy, and even sat down one-on-one with Charlie Rose.
These days, Wang doesn't have to do quite so much selling: Now, the West is coming to him. Last fall, cic and other state-controlled Chinese funds launched a global hunt for bankers, trawling for talent on Wall Street and in London. At one of their recruiting fairs in New York, hundreds of applicants showed up.
Though the financial crisis is hurting China, too—many factories in the Pearl River Delta, the manufacturing heartland of southern China, closed over the past year as US demand softened—Beijing still stands in better shape than the US and other Western powers. Holding nearly $2 trillion in currency reserves and running significant trade surpluses, China can spend to get its economy humming again. (Already, Beijing has launched a stimulus package worth nearly $600 billion, and more could follow.) Having refused to open up many of its banks to global markets—despite intense criticism from the West—China now doesn't have to deal with mountains of bad debt. And unlike Americans, average Chinese have built up vast household savings, more than $500 billion in all. "Credit is still flowing freely in China, as there is no fear that the banks will go belly-up; same with key companies, which are mostly state owned," notes Shaun Rein, managing director of China Market Research Group in Shanghai.
As a result, Wang Jianxi and his colleagues are now picking through the wreckage of Western economies. When the financial crisis first broke, China Investment Corporation pitched in, plowing money into American banks and private equity firms such as Blackstone (investments on which they eventually lost billions). In 2007, cic spent $5.6 billion buying a stake in Morgan Stanley; Beijing has also bought into three of the biggest banks in Australia. More recently, having soured on the finance sector, China has been on a commodities shopping spree. The giant, state-owned resources company chinalco is poised to get more deeply invested in the British-Australian Rio Tinto, one of the world's biggest mining firms. Beijing also recently handed out a $25 billion loan to Russian energy giant Rosneft and is looking for more bargains in the natural resources sector. China computer giant Lenovo now owns ibm's personal computing division, and some Chinese media outlets have speculated that Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp. and another Chinese carmaker might be eyeing General Motors. "Americans need to get used to the fact that China will begin taking a more critical role in business, using the downturn for their advantage," Rein says.
Chinese leaders luxuriate in the attention. "The US is a fatty and needs to take diet pills, but in contrast China is still skinny," one former top financial official recently gloated to the state press. Some Chinese firms and funds are so anxious to hit the fire sale that government officials have to restrain them from openly celebrating over the carcass of the West. "Hold your cash," the head of the government agency that oversees state companies, Li Rongrong, told major Chinese firms in November. "There will be plenty of opportunities in the future."
As it emerges as the investor of last resort, Beijing is aiming to use its business ties to expand its political influence. On a steamy day just before monsoon season, I sat by the muddy banks of the Mekong River in Phnom Penh with a senior Cambodian government official known for his commitment to human rights. "Look across there," he said, pointing to a part of the decidedly low-slung city, where tall new buildings were sprouting up. In the 100-degree heat, we could make out a group of men with wispy stubble and ropy muscles banging together walls. "All that is China's money, Chinese businesses coming in. Everything downtown is being built with China's capital, China's aid."
He paused and looked around; Cambodia is nominally a democracy, but opponents of the long-serving prime minister, Hun Sen, have been disappeared, terrorized, murdered. Ten years ago, the official said, Hun Sen had to watch how far he went—he needed the backing of Western donors and investors. Now, when the West criticizes him, it's no big deal—China has his back. "We depend on [China] now," the official said. "We can't do anything else."
"For decades, you had this idea that the only way to develop was through democracy and capitalism," says Robert Kagan, author of a book on autocracy called The Return of History and the End of Dreams. "Now, what China is proving is that there's another alternative out there." Chris Alden, an expert on China-Africa relations at the London School of Economics, says that among African leaders, for example, "the perception that China is relatively immune to the worst effects of the crisis raises its stature." China may now be Africa's largest lender, pledging nearly $20 billion in 2007; some of this money goes to bringing local politicians to China, where they learn about the model Beijing has used to create three decades of growth, without the pesky democracy.
Even in the United States, there are signs that Beijing's new stature commands respect. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, a longtime China hawk who in 1991 personally unfurled a protest banner in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, has acknowledged that "when human rights concerns are up against money, they always lose." And during a recent visit to China, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton let it be known that the economy would take precedence over human rights topics for the time being.
"No one is going to step forward to hit China now, when we are trying to get them to help us with the crisis," says one longtime congressional staffer. After all, China only has to remind America's leaders of those $700 billion-plus worth of US Treasuries in its coffers.
Enter The Dragon
How utterly depressing...my grandchildren will have to work a year or two in a slave labor camp, to pay off this country's debt to a communist country. That is, if this country still exists.
Why can't we read more about
-
tagged as:
- solution
Why can't we read more about the objective state of affairs for the majority of ordinary Chinese people instead of sensationalist articles which accentuate the threat and fear of a "rising" China? Americans should take heed of this crisis to find insights into American mindsets and behaviors so that the "exceptional" America can learn to live amongst a global family instead of threatening to use military might as right to retain the unfair advantages of imperialist standards and lifestyles.
Meh, another hyperbolized
Meh, another hyperbolized account of the "rise" of China with the usual fearmongering tactics. I live in China, believe me they have plenty of their own problems, and just because the muzzled state-run media doesn't let it all hang out for the international press doesn't make them any less real or troubling. If China's rush to get rich quick at all costs should serve as a model to other developing countries, we may as well nuke ourselves now and be done with it. China has massive environmental problems, simmering social unrest, and will soon have severe water - and hence food - shortages. Eventually it will be time to pay the piper. The fact that all this has come about in a relatively short period of time is all the more alarming. I can sum up China's strategy like this: Borrow outdated Soviet technology to begin the initial industrialization with state-owned enterprises, when that fails entice greedy Western corporations with tax breaks and lax environmental regulations, leverage your huge slave labor population and keep them cheap by reinvesting trade surpluses in US treasury bills instead of injecting the capital into your own country and raising your own people's standard (and cost) of living. Disregard green GDP, the cost of non-renewable resources like clean air and water, rinse, and repeat. Voila! You have economic "growth".
China has contributed nothing to solving any of the world's looming problems, and if anything their own development should (and I believe will) serve as a grim warning for future generations. It is too early to know precisely what they will reap, but it's not looking good. China's corrupt, organized-crime system of gov't will implode again in a perfect storm of environmental armageddon and mass starvation.
"severe water - and hence food - shortages" in China
-
tagged as:
- solution
Maybe the Chinese can cash in some of their dollar investment to buy US agricultural products (as long as our water supplies hold out). That would be good for our farmers, not so good for our fat bellies. Count one more reason to grow your own.
Reality
-
tagged as:
- solution
The realities you describe within China and what the article portrays are in keeping with the future geopolitical and global economic landscape for the next 100 years. China will eventually implode just as we are now. All of this brought on by greed and avarice.
The source of American rot is rooted in a corrupt two party political system that allowed unbridled capitalism to prevail unchecked and those that controlled it to become drunk with the same greed and avarice now affecting the Chinese. It is a vicious circle to be sure. But it is nothing more than a minor foot note addressing the rise and fall of the human race and its short and very bleak influence on this planet. Until reason, logic, and patience supplants greed and hubris, the human race will never rid itself of the poverty of ignorance and shackles of tyranny.
Mars Bondfire
Idiots in charge=disaster
Well, if you're worried about the possibility of China just buying the United States for cash, keep worrying, because China is just one country that's jumped into the fast lane in the last 20 years or so, and likely not to be the only one. But, I'm not worried, because whoever does end up owning the place won't get to enjoy it for long, because the tax man cometh right behind and scoopeth out the profits, and China's got 1.3 billion hungry mouths to feed, as well as other problems, and then China will have THEIR pre-post-derivative-adjustable rate industrial period or something. Then, we'll all go broke, and it's back to rock soup. Yeah, that's gonna happen....
Klaatu marachas necktie
müzik indir
agree to all good comments
Very helpful materials for
Very helpful materials for writing academic book reports.
custom book report writing
Enter the Capitalist Dragon?
As a socialist committed to genuine workers' democracy, Beijing's "State-assisted Capitalism with Chinese characteristics" is just as repulsive as Obama's "State-assisted Nationalizations with Wall Street characteristics." In China's case, workers have no real say in their government's investment decisions; in the U.S. case(such as the federal government owning a majority of the new GM), Private Capital and Free Market Fundamentalism are still the real bosses.
Hmm....It seems that
Hmm....It seems that Americans needs to emphasize on importance of Saving now....may be they can take something from Chineese and Indians how they able to manage the savings..




























