MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

As Mitt Waves Good-Bye, McCain Says I'm Your Guy

Washington Dispatch: At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Romney backers ponder whether they can accept McCain.

February 7, 2008


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), where a speech by Vice President Dick Cheney on Thursday was greeted with chants of "four more years," John McCain was in enemy territory. Many of the right-wing activists who gathered for the annual event scornfully regard the Arizona senator as a false conservative, one who first opposed President Bush's tax cuts and who has too often dared to team up with Democrats in Congress to promote legislation that drives conservatives crazy, including campaign finance and immigration reform.

As attendees milled about the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington D.C., waiting for speeches by McCain and Mitt Romney, the enthusiasm for the former Massachusetts governor was evident. He was supposed to be the man of the hour. Young men inflated Mitt Romney thunder sticks. Volunteers handed out hundreds of giant foam mitts (get it?). No one realized that the media was reporting that Romney was planning to announce during his speech his departure from the presidential race and that, like it or not, they were about to be stuck with John McCain.

When conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham introduced Romney, she hurled a barb or two at McCain, and the crowd ate it up. "It's not enough to say you were a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution," said Ingraham, referencing one of McCain's common lines. The real question is, she said, "What have you done for conservatism lately?"

Romney took the stage to a standing ovation and cheers of "We want Mitt!" As he worked through his stump speech's list of campaign promises–supporting tax cuts, fewer government regulations, a larger military–there was no indication he was giving a concession speech. In fact, he made more than one reference to taking his campaign to the convention. The crowd was in a frenzy.

And then Romney blindsided his fans. "If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win," he said, as the crowd grew silent. "And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror." As it slowly dawned on the committed Mittens that he was dropping out, jeers and shouts of "No!" rose from the audience. Romney smiled sadly and assured them it was true.

Afterward, Romney partisans filed out of the ballroom in a state of shock. "I'm stunned," said Chris Cummings, who had a Romney sign tucked under his arm. "My jaw hit the floor when he said he was pulling out." Cummings said McCain has always "irked him the wrong way," but if it comes to Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton versus McCain, he said he will toe the party line but he won’t be "ecstatic about it."

Others were in a less conciliatory mood. "I understand why he did what he did," supporter Ryan Hayden said of Romney. "He was putting a lot of his own money into the campaign. It was time for him to pull out. But that does not change my feelings on John McCain. I will not vote for him. I will sit this one out."

Romney's Washington D.C. chairwoman, Betsy Werronen, said she was "heartbroken." She noted that phone banking was still underway at the local Romney headquarters as we spoke. She told me she had to the leave the conference in order to tell the volunteers to stop cold-calling.

In the lobby, "Flip Romney," a guy in a giant dolphin suit who has been following Romney around the country reminding people of the ex-governor's flip-flops on key issues, jumped up and down and clapped his flippers above his head. A reporter on the scene turned to his cameraman and said, "Get the clapping dolphin." At one point, an emotional Romney staffer walked past Flip. I mentioned that it looked like the young man was about to cry. "If I could get some salt water, that'd be really nice," the giant dolphin replied.

A few hours after Romney disappointed CPAC, a triumphant McCain took the stage. He was greeted by cheers and a few boos. Before Romney had made the day's news by dropping out, McCain, the frontrunner, had planned to come to the conference to start courting the conservative wing of his party—that is, to counter the anti-McCain crusade that has been mounted by Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, James Dobson, and other conservative influentials. His mission today was to convince this crowd he is indeed a true conservative. And now, with Romney out, he and the conservatives before him were essentially considering how to make the best of a forced marriage.

McCain repeatedly stressed that he understood why the audience of hardcore Republicans were wary of him, and that he did not begrudge them for holding different views from his on many issues. But, he said, he always started with "conservative principles," the same conservative principles espoused by the crowd's god-hero, Ronald Reagan. "My record in public office taken as a whole," McCain said, "is the record of a mainstream conservative."

The crowd was polite, and only booed loudly when McCain brought up immigration. It helped that McCain repeatedly bashed the Democrats–implicitly making the point that Republicans didn't have to really like him, they just had to hate the Democrats more. On the major conservative issues, McCain maintained, he is a committed conservative: national security, abortion, and spending. He added that he would veto any expansion of "entitlement programs." That vow was a crowd pleaser.

After the speech, the Romney supporters in the crowd appeared more conciliatory toward McCain. A young man named Chris Geissler, who had supported Romney's political aspirations ever since the Salt Lake City Olympics in 2002, said that he was "disappointed" and that he would definitely vote for McCain if Romney is his choice for vice president. If not, "I'd be seriously hesitant to vote for McCain, but if it's a conservative V.P. other than Romney, he'll probably get my vote."

"We were sad to see Governor Romney drop out," said Curt Luidhardt, an attendee from Indiana, standing next to his wife. He said he was coming around on McCain. "John McCain will probably be a good nominee for us. He'll do something that President Bush hasn't done, which is shrink the government. And he'll prosecute the war with some seriousness." He paused and said, "I'll vote for that."

Jonathan Stein is a reporter in Mother Jones' Washington, D.C. bureau.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Ron Paul is one great American. Would in God's name would vote for "100 years more war" McCain? McCain, Paul and Huckabee left. Why is the media blacking out Paul?
Posted by:StevensFebruary 7, 2008 8:45:50 PMRespond ^
Because a 100 year war means 100 year of PROFITS!!! HAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!
Posted by:StevenFebruary 7, 2008 8:51:53 PMRespond ^
Time to go on vacation Mitt. Good luck on the roof of your car. And don't worry if you crap all over yourself because you're scared. Remember, you like it up there. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html
Posted by:Brother SamFebruary 8, 2008 12:11:07 AMRespond ^
Yeah, Mitt did it for the good of the party and country in a time of war. Sure. I hear he made no mention of the high burn rate of his children's trust funds. Let's see, $35 million spent plus another $15 to cover the next couple of months and it's obvious why the guy called it quits. He didn't want to hit the $50 million mark with nothing to show for it. Personally, I don't see why conservatives bought his hype. The guy governed to the left of Mike Dukakis and got a free pass from the talking heads. "Anybody But McCain" is a recipe for permanent minority party status. It's time for a "come to Jesus" party, and John McCain is the guy wearing sandals, if not walking on water. Can I get an "Amen," my conservative brothers?!
Posted by:PoliticoFebruary 8, 2008 3:41:02 AMRespond ^
You can rhyme!
Posted by:KevinFebruary 8, 2008 10:14:49 AMRespond ^
Here I was thinking he was pulling out because he was getting his ass handed to him. My mistake.
Posted by:KyleFebruary 8, 2008 11:43:51 AMRespond ^
Because Ron Paul is a white supremist.
Posted by:KaiFebruary 8, 2008 2:22:56 PMRespond ^
The media is "blacking out" Paul for the same reasons they "blacked out" Kucinich on the Democratic side. They both wanted to end the war on drugs. They both wanted to pull out of NAFTA. And they both wanted to get back to Constitutional values. Kucinich was a real threat because he was going to go for what most Americans want--a single-payer health program, and he was going to seriously fight for labor unions, workers, and fight against the special intersts of big corporations controlling everything, as they now do, along with the bankers and oil sheiks. They want to push Kucinich out of Congress next...after all, he was the only Democrat with enough guts, at the time, to submite articles of Imeachment against Cheney and Bush. Anytime you see a concerted effort to blacklist someone--it's probably because the candidate really believes what he says and intends to really do it, as opposed to a lot of promises never fulfilled. So, those are the best ones to vote for..unfortunately, they rarely make it far enough, because American people are so hypnotized and obedient to the mainstream media, which is now controlled by a mere 5 corporations, all of which make money off these wars and special interest favors! Mussolina said fascism should be called corporatism, because it is the perfect merger of corporations and the government..in our case, this echange takes place through lobbyists, who do the CEOs bidding. A Senator or Preesident makes promises if certain legilature is passed, and when they leave public service, they are rewarded with a nice, cushy, 6-figure income in one of the corporations branches. That's American politics today. There are some true patriots out there, though, don't get me wrong..either that, or they do a good job of acting, at least on the Senate Judiciary Committee, because I saw those guys getting really upset about Mukasy and his semantic dances around the issue of torture and waterboarding...I think some of the corruption is general Congress and even more is the White House, really.
Posted by:AlanFebruary 8, 2008 3:11:04 PMRespond ^
Who is accusing Ron Paul of being a supremacist? He's a genuinely good man with a platform full of common sense and back-to-basics ideas. He's just what America needs and just what the entrenched establishment, including the major news medias, don't want. I think it's despicable that someone can just throw out such slander about Dr. Paul. Shame on you!
Posted by:NormanFebruary 8, 2008 4:11:31 PMRespond ^
In Washington and Wall Street, "conservative" has now become a code word for "corporatist," so it's no wonder far-right wingers are being taken by surprise by the emerging sentiments of REAL conservatives, who are finally starting to realize that they have been pawns in the corporatist takeover of our government. More and more conservatives with voices -- authors, commentators, retired officers, former civil servants who've resigned in disgust -- are speaking out to say that the traditional conservative impulse has been used as cannon fodder, in the Owning Class's war on the rest of us. Corporatists have so thoroughly co-opted the conservative moniker, that they now think they ARE conservative, by and large; rather than the neo-liberal profitists (pirates) they really are. The danger to real conservatives now, is that that misidentification may be so engrained in the dialog, that no-one will remember that real conservatives DO have fellow-feelings, rather than just bottom lines. Real conservatives are starting to realize that the me-first-and-only royalists now in power are not committed to any sort of religious principles or community values, no matter their rhetoric. Indeed, urge a corporatist to give to the poor, and his first question is whether or not he can get a tax break by doing so. The natural corporatist response to natural disasters, is to sell evacuees "vacation-evacuation" packages, as if a homeowner having his or her home and community destroyed, should view that as a golden opportunity (one worth paying for) to get drunk on a beach somewhere. Would these same flights take on non-paying passengers, who simply want to get away from the flying timber? Don't bet on it. After that, they tear down the usable remaining housing, to erect expensive gated condo communities, for a massive profit, while homelessness runs rampant. And what do they care? You don't turn a profit doing people "favors!" Contrast that profitting-on-disaster impulse with the principled conservative response to disaster, which is to come to the aid of those in trouble, even if it takes from their own pockets. This charitable impulse was once cited by the profitists as the "proper" way to handle social safety-nets, soup lines and unemployment, even retirement. Such impulses to help those less fortunate are so far from the beltway definition of "conservatism," as to be laughable, yet the corporatists were only too glad to offload such burdens onto those "chump" conservatives who can't let people starve. And still, the corporatists have portrayed themselves as one of the fold of conservative sentiment. Up to now, real conservatives have eaten it up, because the corporatists are more than willing to lie about their motives, in order to get into good conservative graces. McCain is "surging" because he's a real conservative himself, which is why he doesn't fit with the self-annointed Washington establishment. Romney bombed out because he was only "conservative for a day," -- and because people could tell the difference. I'm oh-so-liberal, myself, but I have no problem with REAL conservatives. So long as their convictions are honestly come by, there will be a middle ground of discussion and compromise, which is all I ask. Corporatists don't care about compromise, and refuse to discuss differences. Compromise means less profit; and discussion, in their view, only gives the "enemy" (and EVERYONE is their enemy) a chance to screw them -- which is what they would do, if roles were reversed. Losing possible profits is against their religion. But it's not at all against the profit-religion to LIE for profit, which is how they've gotten where they are, and how they stay there. It feels dirty, even to talk in these terms. Bring back REAL conservatism, and maybe we'll have somewhere to go as a country!
Posted by:Dan MortensonFebruary 8, 2008 4:40:34 PMRespond ^
Listen, Mojo, fix your paragraph breaks! It's anti-clarity, this war your comment system is waging against paragraphs! Commenters shouldn't have to resort to tricks such as double line-breaks, to get a simple separation of paragraphs. Your contributors would boycott, if their articles ended up looking like the comments do. ----- Kill your TV, and free your mind.
Posted by:Dan MortensonFebruary 8, 2008 4:45:15 PMRespond ^
Paul is a white supremacist because of his stance on immigration. But he's not the only candidate who does this; even Obama wants intensified laws against immigration. All of these candidates are terrible people who get on stage and do their little dance for votes so they can get in an office high enough that they'll get bigger paychecks from outside 'sources'.
Posted by:JustinHFebruary 8, 2008 4:55:36 PMRespond ^
geez, Dan. No one else writes multiple paragraph posts. :-)
Posted by:mikeFebruary 8, 2008 8:25:49 PMRespond ^
MacCain must be a stauch supporter of rape and incest if he is against abortion. Also. what is a woman to do who has a fetus with its brain outside the skull and so will be unable to come through the birth canal? or heart and intestines outside the rib cage? Roll over and die?
Posted by:Audrey ButcherFebruary 10, 2008 11:31:54 AMRespond ^
But that is the tragedy. Not only do we not like McCain, we don't hate the democrats more. Even Hillary represents the lessor of two evils in this case, and at this point, I am praying that Obama is on the democratic ticket. This - after 29 years as a registered republican.
Posted by:BethFebruary 10, 2008 7:50:34 PMRespond ^
My belief is, Romney was another pro-war fire-breather, who, when it comes down to it, doesn't really want his damning fingerprints on The Button. He might want to fondle it, and take it to parties with him(fun at parties, A-MAZE your friends!), but not really want to be the one responsible for decimating a third-world country to access them there oil 'pozitz. And, why harp on the oil issue like a broken record? 'Cause it's my firm belief that, were it not for those oil deposits, for one no one would really give a tinker's damn about the middle east in general, and we would not be witnessing the ugliness in the news today. How many Halliburton shares is Romney holding onto? Only his broker knows for sure...and I'm pretty sure that WAS his broker, running down the hall yelling something about an 'urgent appointment'. Part I DON'T understand is the suitcase. Hey, is that an airplane ticket on the floor? Better go catch him, he might need it...hehehehehe
Posted by:BertFebruary 10, 2008 8:43:35 PMRespond ^
Hurry up and let the republican win already.
Posted by:MirandaFebruary 25, 2008 7:09:09 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS