Hours Before the Debate, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Spreads an Unverified Russian Claim

The “disinformation” was immediately seized on by Republicans to defend the president.

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.Tom Williams/Congressional Quarterly via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Just hours before President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are set to square off in their first debate, John Ratcliffe, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, has declassified documentation of a theory floated by Russian intelligence. While Ratcliffe explicitly warned that US intelligence could not vouch for the theory’s accuracy, writing that it may “reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” Trump backers, including the president’s son, have already seized upon the Trump-ally’s selective disclosure to spread claims that Hillary Clinton somehow masterminded a plot to pin a “Russia hoax” on her 2016 opponent. 

The claim, contained in a letter from the director of national intelligence to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and described by Ratcliffe as deriving from US insight into a “Russian intelligence analysis,” alleges that Clinton “approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal” against Trump in relation to his links to Putin and in light of the DNC having been hacked. If Russia concluded this, they don’t seem to have uncovered anything secret: Clinton’s highlighting of Trump’s ties to Russia, which were a subject of controversy during the campaign, was well known—she did so on the debate stage, as the campaign she directed pressed the case in other venues.

The intelligence had previously been rejected as unreliable by both Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to Politico. As a Senate aide told Mother Jones, the committe “has known of this stream of intelligence for years and discounted it.” The bipartisan committee extensively reviewed the Russian operation over several years, concluding in an August report that Russia had interfered in the 2016 contest and that the president’s campaign had welcomed such assistance.

Before becoming Trump’s pick to lead the US intelligence community, Ratcliffe served as a Republican member of Congress from Texas where he acted as one of the president’s most ardent defenders during the House’s impeachment hearings. Ratcliffe has a history of spreading false and misleading information about the FBI’s investigations into Trump’s ties to Russia, and of bolstering the president’s claims that Trump has been the victim of a Deep State plot.

Rachel Cohen, the communications director for Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chairmain of the Senate Intelligence Committee, tweeted that Ratcliffe’s letter was “Russian disinformation,” that was “Laundered by the Director of National Intelligence and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” In a follow-up statement, Ratcliffe denied the revelation was disinformation, promising more details in a forthcoming congressional briefing.

The letter comes a day before former FBI Director James Comey will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Graham, which is reviewing the FBI’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate