Trump and His Right-Wing Allies Are Losing Their Minds Over the Whistleblower Complaint

The president and other conservatives are going to wild lengths to try to tamp down the latest on the allegations.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The long-anticipated whistleblower complaint that has become a central part of House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump was finally released Thursday, and it did not reflect well on the White House. 

There was already damning public information thanks to a memo, released Wednesday, detailing what was said during Trump’s July 25 call with the leader of Ukraine, but the whistleblower’s complaint hints at other, similarly troubling conversations and a sprawling White House effort to cover it up. After Trump’s call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky , the whistleblower, a member of the intelligence community whose identity has not been revealed, claims that White House officials moved to “lock down” records of the call and improperly store them in an electronic system reserved for classified information. Crucially, the whistleblower added that this was “not the first time” Trump’s advisers have had to abuse this system to shield evidence of his calls with foreign leaders for political, not security, reasons. 

The allegations were deemed “credible” by acting national intelligence director Joseph Maguire and intelligence community inspector general Michael Atkinson, both Trump appointees, but unsurprisingly, its findings were immediately challenged by Trump and his most rabid supporters. Trump fired the first volley Thursday morning from his Twitter feed with an all-caps message that said Democrats were trying to destroy the Republican Party “AND ALL THAT IT STANDS FOR.” He later deleted the tweet. 

White House officials have already attempted to paint the whistleblower as a politically-motivated leaker, despite Maguire’s contention to House Intelligence Committee members during a Thursday hearing that he does not know the person’s identity. Fox News reported Tuesday that “the administration will release a document showing” the whistleblower “had indications of ‘political bias’ in favor of ‘a rival candidate’ of the president.” Atkinson also acknowledged to the Justice Department that the whistleblower has “some indicia of an arguable political bias,” but said the complaint nonetheless raises “urgent concern.” (The Office of the Director of National Intelligence also indicated in a letter to the whistleblower’s attorney that ODNI believes the complainant “has acted in good faith and fully complied with the law.”)

But the Trump administration is disregarding the assessment of the intelligence community. Their alternative line of reasoning was reflected in a set of White House talking points, which the administration inadvertently sent to House Democrats on Wednesday. “This case,” the White House statement said, “just shows another example of the ‘Deep State,’ the media, and Democrats in Congress damaging out national security by leaking confidential information in an attempt to seek political gain.”

During a private speech Thursday morning to American staffers at the United Nations, Trump said whoever provided information to the whistleblower was “close to a spy” and alluded to severe punishments for spies “in the old days,” according to reports in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times

On Twitter, Trump’s son, Donald Trump, Jr., attacked “the media and their bosses at the DNC” for pushing the whistleblower’s narrative, which—it’s worth emphasizing—emerged from within Trump’s White House. 

The whistleblower’s politics dominated pro-Trump Twitter, where the still-unknown intelligence official was painted as a liberal Trump critic. 

Other Trump defenders, including former administration official Fred Fleitz, stuck with the narrative of an anti-Trump conspiracy. Fleitz, who served as chief of staff to national security adviser John Bolton and was under consideration to be Trump’s director of national intelligence, wrote in a tweet that the complaint was “too convenient and too perfect to come from a typical whistleblower.” 

Fleitz’s hunch, which he floated online without evidence, is that Democratic House Intelligence Committee staff might have helped “orchestrate” the complaint. “It is therefore important that Congress find out where this complaint came from,” he wrote

Not all Republicans were so easily persuaded that the complaint was a nothing burger. “There is a lot in the whistleblower complaint that is concerning,” Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas), who is not seeking reelection, tweeted Thursday morning. Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the complaint “troubling” and said “Republicans ought not just circle the wagons” to protect Trump just yet. 

Not one House Republican has indicated support yet for Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to formally launch an impeachment inquiry. More than half of all House members—218 Democrats and one independent per the New York Times—do support the inquiry.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate