Spanish Lawyer: Obama’s bin Laden “War Crime”

President Barack Obama at work.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5680710466/">The White House</a>/Flickr


Some lawyers earn their juicy headlines by representing pop-culture-icons-turned-murderers.

Others beef-up their brand name by defending the rich and infamous.

And some lawyers simply accuse Barack Obama of perpetrating unspeakable war crimes.

Little-known Spanish lawyer Daniel Fiol has lodged a complaint with the International Criminal Court accusing Obama of crimes against humanity, according to the UK’s The Daily Telegraph.

The complaint alleges that the May assassination of Osama bin Laden was a violation of both the Geneva Conventions and Pakistani sovereignty. Fiol clarified his position by stating bin Laden should have instead stood trial for “some terrible and appalling atrocities,” and then went on to awkwardly joke about definitely not being on Al Qaeda’s payroll.

It’s not unheard of for Spanish legal figures to take on top officials of other countries through the framework of universal jurisdiction, but this attempt is quite a reach. There is none of the kind of damning evidence that characterizes, for instance, Bush-era torture and abuses of power, and the complaint comes off more like an ideological publicity stunt than the product of sound reasoning.

Fiol’s argument is a weak legal charge on par with quickly forgotten “Obama is a war criminal” nuggets like those made by Ralph Nader (over Iraq) or the African National Congress Youth League (over Libya).

If Fiol really wanted his claims to snag a lot of attention, he should have just written that Obama was acting like a very specific war criminal.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.