Recon

Mixed signals on energy

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


A week after President Bush declared we’re “addicted to oil” in his State of the Union address, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory laid off 32 employees due to a $28 million budget shortfall. ••• Two weeks later, Bush visited the lab and restored $5 million in funding, explaining, “I recognize that there has been some interesting mixed signals.” ••• Bush’s energy plan aims to replace 30% of gasoline use with ethanol by 2030. ••• Archer Daniels Midland, the world’s largest producer of ethanol from corn, has given more than $3 million to politicians since 2000. ••• A recent Cornell study found that refining corn-based ethanol burns 29% more fossil-fuel energy than the amount of energy that is produced. ••• In 2005, oil companies received $2 billion in tax credits for adding ethanol to their gasoline. ••• The average new car sold in the U.S. is 5% less fuel efficient than a car made in the late ’80s. ••• Raising fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon would save more oil by 2017 than the total projected output of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. ••• Bush has proposed an 11% budget cut for a program to reduce the federal government’s energy use. ••• Less than 2% of oil is used for generating electricity; coal provides half of the nation’s electric power. ••• While pledging to invest more in “zero-emission coal-fired plants,” Bush has proposed slashing overall funding for clean coal by 12%. ••• In 2001, the administration weakened efficiency standards for air conditioners, which could have saved as much energy as that produced by 60 power plants over the next 25 years. ••• When asked that same year whether our voracious energy appetite was to blame for high gas prices, then-White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said, “That’s a big no…the American way of life is a blessed one.”

MAY/JUNE 2006 | MOTHER JONES 23

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate