The Big Day For the Most Important Number on Earth

Can you build a global movement around an arcane point of scientific data? We’re about to find out.

Image by Flikr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nattu/">nattu</a>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

Nearly two decades after writing a book that popularized the term “global warming,” MoJo contributing writer Bill McKibben founded 350.org. He is chronicling his journey into organizing with a series of columns leading up to the global climate summit in Copenhagen this December. You can find the others here. And you can put yourself on the cover of MoJo‘s special issue on climate change here.

If you’ve worked on a political campaign, you can imagine what our office looks like about now. We’ve set up temporary HQ in a few rooms in lower Manhattan, and the pizza boxes are stacked toward the ceiling. Everyone—me especially—is starting to look a little frazzled, and the stereo is increasingly punked out. Loud is good past a certain point of fatigue.

But this campaign is a little different, not quite as desperate. We don’t have to wait till the last minute for the results to come in. We’ve got our little scorecard on the front page of the 350.org website, and lately it’s been telling nothing but good news. Every hour or so the number of actions spikes upward—we went past 4,800 about an hour ago. And the 172nd country just came on board (that would be the Seychelles Islands). Already, by a huge margin, this will be the most widespread political action in the planet’s history. (The closest competitor we’ve found: 120 nations participating in the Stand Up Against Poverty campaign). 

Photos from flickr site Featured Global 350 Actions.

I’m bragging of course—some of this is just pure organizer ego. Mostly, though, I’m excited for two reasons. One, we’ve proved that science isn’t too complicated for people to understand. If you’d asked, 18 months ago, Can you get the world to rally around an arcane point of scientific data, I think most of the betting would have been: No. We went with it because we needed a target to hold our leaders to, and because we needed something that would cross linguistic boundaries. Arabic numerals were good for both.

Two, we’ve proved that this is not some affectation of elite white westerners. A lot of our best organizers and most amazing volunteers are from the global south. There will be at least 50 rallies across China, and 150 across India; almost every country in Africa is participating (and we just got an amazing op-ed in from Desmond Tutu, which ran in USA Today). On one level, this should be no surprise—these are the places and people who will be hurt first and worst by climate change. But too many westerners imagine that poverty means you can’t take time to think about your kid’s future. A few days ago, jumping the gun, some fishermen in Mumbai took their small craft out in the harbor and made a giant 350—as the story in the Times of India made clear, they understand all too well that they’re on the firing line.

We have one other great advantage as organizers: Since we’re working across the whole globe, we know already that it’s going to be snowing some places and baking hot in others, that it will pour rain in some spots (including, apparently, Times Square, where we’ll be on Saturday to show images from around the world on the JumboTrons). It doesn’t matter. We’ll have made our point across the planet. We’ll have taken science and made it news—taken reality and pushed it into politics.

Thanks to all.

Photos from flickr site Featured Global 350 Actions.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.