Bagels!


BAGELS!….One of these days I guess I’m going to have to try a bagel when I’m in New York City. My crappy taste buds being what they are, I suppose my reaction is going to be the usual (i.e., “they just taste like bagels to me”), but I’m still curious. It hardly seems plausible that transplanted New Yorkers can’t make good bagels elsewhere in the country, and insufficiently developed consumer taste doesn’t seem like a good explanation for this lack, as it often is for ethnic food of other varieties.

(Can you order a New York City bagel over the internet? I mean, I’m sure you can, but do they survive the shipping process tasting as good as if they were bought locally? Or do I really have to get on a plane and head east to perform this experiment?)

Anyway, this spate of bagel blogging was inspired by a David Bernstein post about bagels over at the Volokh Conspiracy, and what really amused me wasn’t the bagel stuff itself, but Bernstein’s being annoyed that the book he was reading, The Bagel: The Surprising History of a Modest Bread, “relies on union sources, the story is completely one-sided; the reader doesn’t get the perspective of any of the bagel bakery owners, just the workers.” We all have our pet peeves, so I guess I shouldn’t laugh, but Bernstein seems constitutionally incapable of ever letting a positive mention of unions pass unnoticed, insisting that every advance in worker rights would have happened anyway due solely to rising union standards. I say: tell it to the janitors, pal. Rising living standards don’t really seem to have helped their cause a helluva lot. In fact, tell it to the median worker in general, who’s made virtually no gains at all over the past three decades despite a near doubling in per capita GDP during the period.

Eh. I guess that just shows that I have some pet peeves too. I still need to try a real NYC bagel one of these days, though. If and when I do, which shop should I try, O commenters?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.