Public Option Finale?

Healthcare reform took a fairly unexpected detour this weekend.  A consensus seems to be developing, even among liberal senators, that the public option just isn’t going to happen, so now a whole bunch of alternatives are being discussed to make up for its loss.  Including this:

Sources who have been briefed on the negotiations say that Medicare buy-in is attracting the most interest. Expanding Medicaid is running into more problems, though there’s some appeal because, unlike increasing subsidies, expanding Medicaid actually saves you money. There’s also ongoing discussion about tightening regulations on insurers, but I don’t know the precise menu of options being considered.

The idea here is that you could buy into Medicare if you’re between the age of 55 and 65.  It’s the ultimate public option, but only for a subset of the population.  On the bright side, it’s a pretty big demographic, and it’s also the demographic that, on average, has the most health issues.  On the less bright side, I also imagine that it’s a demographic that’s pretty well covered by employer insurance already.

In any case, I think it’s a great idea, though I have a hard time believing it’s going to be suddenly resurrected at the 11th hour like this.  Still — and with the caveat that I’m a lukewarm supporter of the public option in the first place — I’d probably take this over the public option as a straight-up trade any time.  Not only does it do a lot of good, but it sets the stage for possible future age reductions.  Ezra Klein runs down the rest of the possible compromises here.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.