Why Now for DADT Repeal?

OK, so what caused Barack Obama to change his mind and actively press for repeal of DADT this year? Offhand, I’d say there are three leading contenders:

  • Nothing changed his mind. His plan all along has been to do it this summer or next, and he was willing to stay quiet and accept the hostility of advocacy groups before this because he knew that a bit of discretion on his part offered the best chance for enacting permanent change with broad public support. This is more or less Mark Kleiman’s view.
  • Strong pressure from the gay community forced his hand. In other words, this is an example of that old FDR legend where he wants to do something, but tells his supporters they have to “go out and make me do it.” (It’s worth noting that this apocryphal story1 is pretty popular among liberals as a story, but we all sure hate it in practice.)
  • Obama (and congressional Democrats) are afraid they’re going to lose their majority in November and will then lose their chance to push this through for good.

Because I’m a milquetoast centrist sellout, I’m going to punt and say that the answer is all three. Obama really has planned to do it all along during his first term but without a more specific timetable; the pressure from gay and lefty advocacy groups helped push congressional leaders into action and they in turn pressured Obama; and there was probably some additional political calculus related to the possibility of Democrats losing their House majority in November. That’s my guess, anyway.

1At least, I assume it’s apocryphal. I managed to find a reference to it from I.F. Stone in 1969 once, but I’ve never been able to track it back any further than that.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.