Tread Boldly

Hot diggity. The GOP leadership has released “Tread Boldly,” a guidebook for Republican members of Congress during the summer recess, and it includes a whole section called “Spending Restraint Solutions for Discussion.” Finally, we’ll get some details! So here they are:

Canceling unspent “stimulus” funds, saving up to $266 billion….Canceling excessive spending increases already in the pipeline….Cap Discretionary Spending….Freeze Congress’ Budget….Eliminate Unnecessary and Duplicative Federal Programs….Audit the Government for Ways to Save.

That’s fairly underwhelming, no? I’ll give them credit for the business about canceling unspent stimulus funds. That’s actual money. But a spending cap? Attacking waste’n’fraud? Freezing the minuscule legislative budget? “Auditing” the government? These are the hoariest tropes imaginable for anyone who wants to sound tough on spending but avoid any actual, real-life spending cuts. Where’s Social Security? Medicare? Medicaid? The Pentagon? Farm subsidies? Or any other actual, named program? Nowhere.

But there is support for extending the Bush tax cuts at a cost of $3.1 trillion over ten years. There’s no problem being specific about that. For some reason, it’s only spending they have trouble getting serious about.

(Via Hit & Run)

POSTSCRIPT: The cover is sort of….odd, too, isn’t it? I guess all parties do the nostalgia thing now and again, but Ike and Churchill and Maggie and Reagan and Lech (what? no John Paul II?) and TR and Jack? Seriously? Two British prime ministers, and pride of place to two Republicans who modern party members wouldn’t be caught dead endorsing?

And “Tread Boldly”? Not to get too ridiculous here, but when you think of “treading,” is “boldly” really the first word that comes to mind?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.