Incandescent Bulbs Not Banned. Repeat: Not Banned

The strange conservative jihad against energy efficient light bulbs continues today. Higher efficiency standards were mandated by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, a bill passed by massive majorities in Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, but no matter. The Rush Limbaugh crowd has turned it into a poster child for socialism run amok, and repealing it is now a top priority among among the tea party crowd. Here’s Stephen Moore in the Wall Street Journal today:

The light bulb ban was part of the 2007 energy bill. It will outlaw the sale of traditional 100 watt bulbs starting in 2012. Many Americans dislike the new fluorescent bulbs, which give off less heat and are more energy efficient, because they don’t like the quality of the lighting.

Nope. Traditional bulbs will continue to be available. They’ll just be more efficient. As Stephen Lacey tells us, Philips brought new, higher efficiency incandescent bulbs to market several months ago:

It’s not just Philips making these bulbs. GE and Sylvania are also producing new, energy-efficient incandescents using the same technology. And by 2014, consumers will not be forced to buy more expensive LEDs or moderately priced CFLs — they’ll be able to buy incandescent bulbs that today cost $1.42 and use 27% less energy.

The table on the right shows the new standards. (Details here.) Basically, the new bulbs produce the equivalent of 100 watts of light output using only 72 watts, the equivalent of 75 watts using only 53 watts, etc. And they’re still incandescent, and they still provide the same kind of light you’re used to. If you don’t like CFLs, you’re free to continue not to use them.

Repeal of the EISA standards failed earlier this week, but the tea partiers aren’t giving up. It just passed on a voice vote in the House as an amendment to an appropriations bill, all based on the myth that incandescent bulbs have been banned and you’d better stockpile them quick before the EPA jackboots march into your local hardware store and haul them all away. But it’s not true. You can still buy incandescent bulbs. They’ll just be more energy efficient.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate