Narayana Kocherlakota thinks the Fed needs to respond to the coronavirus pandemic by reducing interest rates:
The outbreak has triggered a huge burst of risk aversion in financial markets. We should expect that risk aversion to manifest itself as a drag on household and business spending on travel and many other services. There is, of course, the possibility that this risk aversion continues to grow, creating its own negative dynamic: As consumers and businesses respond to alarming events, they pull back, causing growth to slow still more.
This cycle is why the economic threat from the virus is so unnerving. If the cycle develops, it would represent an adverse demand shock that will weigh on businesses’ willingness to hire and raise prices. The appropriate monetary policy response, of course, is to ease interest rates.
I think Kocherlakota is right—though perhaps not for the reason he outlines. At this point, we still don’t know how strongly the coronavirus outbreak will affect the US economy. It’s unclear if rate cuts are appropriate yet, and under normal circumstances I might favor waiting a bit longer before making a decision.
However, even before the outbreak there was a good case to be made for at least a modest reduction in interest rates. So even if the coronavirus outbreak turns out to have only a small effect on the economy, a rate cut is probably a good idea anyway. The added benefit of demonstrating that the Fed is willing to deal aggressively with a public health emergency is just gravy.
So yes: cut interest rates soon. The upside might be high and the downside is almost certainly low.
And we respect that! But maybe you’d consider supporting our work directly? Help fund more journalism that seeks the truth and holds power to account. We can’t do it without you.
We noticed you have an ad blocker on. Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones' investigative journalism?
Mother Jones asks the hard questions.
But this isn’t one of them. Can you help fund more investigative journalism?
With the Supreme Court term over and midterms ramping up, our reporters are following leads and analyzing how decisions shake out across the nation. You can help us stay on top of every story.
Any amount you chip in fuels more reporting that chases the truth and holds power to account—reporting that’s critically needed right now.
Mother Jones asks the hard questions.
But this isn’t one of them. Can you help fund more investigative journalism?
With the Supreme Court term over and midterms ramping up, our reporters are following leads and analyzing how decisions shake out across the nation. You can help us stay on top of every story.
Any amount you chip in fuels more reporting that chases the truth and holds power to account—reporting that’s critically needed right now.