Can Personal Savings Rescue Us From an Upcoming Recession?

If the coronavirus shock puts the economy into a recession, how should we respond? Here’s the chart that makes me ask the question:

In all recent recessions, the personal saving rate has plummeted beforehand, which makes it hard for consumers to respond to the shock of losing income. Their only option is to reduce their consumption. But that’s not true right now. After the Great Recession, the saving rate spiked upward and has continued to grow at a modest rate ever since.

So here’s my question, aimed at serious economists because it’s above my pay grade: would a normal stimulus work in a case like this? If a recession hits and savings are low, people are forced to cut back on spending and this is what propels the recession. Putting big chunks of money in their pockets without bothering too much about targeting it is obviously a good thing. But if savings are high, what’s the point? People have money to spend, so that’s not the problem. They’re just afraid to spend it (or can’t spend it because businesses are shut down).

There are, of course, plenty of individuals who are going to lose their jobs and can’t make up for that out of savings. On a purely humanitarian basis, we should do everything we can to help them. I have no argument with that. My question is solely macroeconomic: would a large, general purpose stimulus be much help in a situation like the one we face now, where savings are high and the spending shock is obviously extremely temporary?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate