Chart of the Day: Police Shootings of Unarmed People Are Down

Since late spring, police killings of unarmed people have started to trend down. Here’s the data from the Washington Post’s fatal force database:

Up through May, police shot and killed 28 unarmed people. In the four months following the death of George Floyd on May 25th, police have killed three. 

It’s a strain to draw any conclusions from such a tiny sample,¹ but I’m still struck by this. It’s an 87 percent drop in police killings of unarmed people, and it began right around the time that protests over Floyd’s death were spreading nationwide. As a comparison, police shootings of armed suspects haven’t changed much: They continued during the summer at the same level as before and continued to disproportionately impact people of color. This suggests that the drop in killings of unarmed people isn’t due to any larger trend in police becoming less lethal. It’s a separate phenomenon.

Very tentatively, then, we may now have a bit of evidence that policing has begun to evolve in response to America’s season of civil unrest over unjust killings. The big picture of overall police killings still hasn’t changed, but collectively police forces do seem to be showing greater restraint about shooting unarmed people—a legally and morally fraught problem, to say the least. If this keeps up, it suggests real impact from the Black Lives Matter protests, and is good news for everyone.

¹Although, for you stats nerds out there, the difference is significant at the p =.01 level.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate