Lizzo Could Be Another Beyoncé. “Cuz I Love You” Proves That.

So give her a Grammy already.

Rich Fury/Getty Images for Coachella

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

This week: Cuz I Love You by Lizzo (Atlantic Records, 2019)

Why we’re into it: In Cuz I Love You Lizzo seizes her authentic voice as an entertainer and cultural icon—solidifying her position among the greats.

Lizzo is no stranger to making really good music —who can forget her beloved EP Coconut Oil and a handful of solid single releases like “Truth Hurts” and “Boys.” Now with the release of her third studio album Cuz I Love You, she’s on her way to achieving the range and complexity of the iconic, ever-changing, ever-inspiring Beyoncé Knowles-Carter.

Lizzo—who’s real name is Melissa Jefferson—isn’t new to the music industry, but this album is as fresh and exciting as a debut. In some ways it is, because Lizzo’s been tasked with re-introducing herself to a new, larger fanbase. A no-skip album of 11 tracks, Lizzo throws listeners straight into her world of self-care, no-bullshit, and empathy for one’s self.

Opening with the title track “Cuz I Love You,” is a bold move—even a risk—but one that pays off. Reminiscent of a marching band’s routine, the track is invigorated with the energy of a live performance and complimented by Lizzo’s signature vocals. One reason the powerful and boisterous tone actually works is because Lizzo holds steadfastly to it throughout the album. “Like A Girl” is a Lizzo song to the core, one that’s made for queens and queers, and meant to be danced to on the club floor with it’s quick and catchy rap and infectious chorus. It’s 2019’s “Who Run The World.”

Lizzo’s generous spirit is in full force for giving us “Exactly How I Feel” and “Tempo” from Gucci Mane and Missy Elliott respectively. Two tracks that invite some of the best recent deliveries from the two. In a classic Beyoncé move, Lizzo curated two specific voices to help express her message in a way that never overshadows her own star power. 

In only 11 tracks, she covers an entire rainbow of emotion, with the pop bangers of “Tempo,” “Like A Girl,”  and “Juice” that beg your booty to shake along with the beat, pivoting to soulful and classic belt-worthy songs “Better In Color,” “Heaven Help Me,” and “Cry Baby.” But if there’s anything Lizzo understands, it’s balance.

“Lingerie” and “Jerome” prove Lizzo doesn’t need to retreat behind the uptempo tone that’s become synonymous with her image. Her ability to maneuver between genres like soul and hip/hop, then into R&B with her signature pop beats below is an approach Beyoncé has made her signature.

Some say the music is too joyful, or that it lacks individuality, or as Pitchfork put it, belongs in “in any given rom-com or yogurt commercial.” (Lizzo then responded to not-so-gracefully.) That ability to craft pure joy is something we at Mother Jones value in our pop music—as you can see here, here, here, and here. But when artists like Beyoncé and Lizzo do so, they’re often met with disdain and shallow reviews, asserting that these women need to go deeper, to “do this” or “do that.” But the ability to convey joy and self-empowerment is who Lizzo really is. Asking her to do something other than that would defeat the purpose of works like  Cuz I Love You. As Nastia Voynovkaya noted, “It’s clear that Lizzo doesn’t get permission to be joyous and carefree in the way that white peers such as Carly Rae Jepsen and Taylor Swift can—easily, profitably and without skepticism.”

Above all else, Lizzo reflects what also makes Beyoncé so great: They’re pop culture powerhouses while still being authentically themselves. They understand that the title of “entertainer” isn’t constraining but freeing. And Lizzo is gloriously freeing, evident by just one listen to Cuz I Love You.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate