A Real American Workplace

After studying corporate downsizing, a government staff sees it up close.

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


When describing his pet project, the Office of the American Workplace, Labor Secretary Robert Reich promised in 1993 that it would guide a worried public through the job market’s turbulent seas. “The workplace is a win-win or a lose-lose situation,” he said. “We all win or we all lose together.”

Let’s hope he’s wrong. It turns out not even the folks at the Office of the American Workplace are safe. All 50 OAW staffers–who studied workplace conditions, strike prevention, and worker-friendly options to corporate downsizing–are likely to join the cruel job market they know all too well.

The GOP tanked the OAW’s $7 million budget after President Clinton made the agency responsible for monitoring federal contracts and canceling those with companies that use scabs. Apparently, Clinton gave OAW the new responsibility as a boon to unions after he failed to pass an anti-strike replacement bill.

OAW staff members, meanwhile, await word on their future. “The Labor Department and the union haven’t worked out what will happen,” says one ex-staffer.

Who should these latest victims of downsizing go to for advice? No one’s quite sure. In the past, they could always turn to the Office of the American Workplace.

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate