Times Calls Out Spitzer’s Boo on Use of “Boo”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Buried in the New York Timesouting of “Kristen”—a.k.a Ashley Alexandra Dupré—a.k.a. Eliot Spitzer’s boo—comes this strange line:

On [Dupré’s MySpace] Web page was a recording of what she described as her latest track, “What We Want,” an amateurish, hip-hop inflected rhythm and blues tune that asks, “Can you handle me, boy?” and used some dated slang, calling someone her “boo.”

Now, to pick apart this less than charitable and, frankly, catty article would take quite a while. But for now, let’s address the linguistic issue here. Opinion at MoJo tends toward “boo” being not only current, but timeless. Urban Dictionary traces the origins of “boo” all the way back to the adoption of the French “beau” at the time of Caribbean colonization. Fast forward a couple of centuries and Tupac deployed “boo” in “It Ain’t Easy” off his 1995 Me Against the World album. A full decade later, the term was still in use, as Usher’s “My Boo” (feat. Alicia Keys) won a Grammy for best R&B performance in 2005 (see below). The next year, Brooke Valentine sang “He can call me his boo / But he call me dope girl, cuz I got that oooh.” So it’s pretty clear “boo” is here to stay. But did anyone really trust the Times as an arbiter of slang?

—Justin Elliott

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate