Times Calls Out Spitzer’s Boo on Use of “Boo”


Buried in the New York Timesouting of “Kristen”—a.k.a Ashley Alexandra Dupré—a.k.a. Eliot Spitzer’s boo—comes this strange line:

On [Dupré’s MySpace] Web page was a recording of what she described as her latest track, “What We Want,” an amateurish, hip-hop inflected rhythm and blues tune that asks, “Can you handle me, boy?” and used some dated slang, calling someone her “boo.”

Now, to pick apart this less than charitable and, frankly, catty article would take quite a while. But for now, let’s address the linguistic issue here. Opinion at MoJo tends toward “boo” being not only current, but timeless. Urban Dictionary traces the origins of “boo” all the way back to the adoption of the French “beau” at the time of Caribbean colonization. Fast forward a couple of centuries and Tupac deployed “boo” in “It Ain’t Easy” off his 1995 Me Against the World album. A full decade later, the term was still in use, as Usher’s “My Boo” (feat. Alicia Keys) won a Grammy for best R&B performance in 2005 (see below). The next year, Brooke Valentine sang “He can call me his boo / But he call me dope girl, cuz I got that oooh.” So it’s pretty clear “boo” is here to stay. But did anyone really trust the Times as an arbiter of slang?

—Justin Elliott

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.