The McCain Brand, Diluted


The Baltimore Sun has bad news for McCain:

John McCain once had the most powerful brand in American politics.

He was often called the country’s most popular politician and widely admired for his independent streak. It wasn’t too many years ago that “maverick” was the cliche of choice in describing him.

But that term didn’t even make the list this year when voters were asked by the Pew Research Center to sum up McCain in a single word. “Old” got the most mentions, followed by “honest,” “experienced,” “patriot,” “conservative” and a dozen more. The words “independent,” “change” or “reformer” weren’t among them….

For many voters, his image today is as an outspoken defender of an unpopular war in Iraq and a supporter of Bush’s economic policies, including the tax cuts that McCain voted against in the Senate but now promotes as a presidential candidate.

In a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 54 percent of respondents said they are looking for a “new president who would bring greater changes to current policies, even if that person is less experienced and tested.” The message to the McCain campaign ought to be clear — branding the Senator as “experienced,” “patriot,” or “conservative,” as they are already doing, just isn’t going to work this time around. (“Experienced” didn’t work for Clinton, and “patriot” doesn’t seem to work for anybody.)

They have to find a way to get on the change wagon, but without sounding like a faint echo of Barack Obama. The 2000 John McCain might have been able to do that. But the 2008 John McCain, who has spent eight years warming up to Bush and becoming the candidate of the Republican establishment, seems to have ruined his chance to do that. What a drastic misreading of the political climate.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.